Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Multi-objective optimization for smart cities: a systematic review of algorithms, challenges, and future directions.
YiFan Chen1,2, Weng Howe Chan2,3, Eileen Lee Ming Su4
1Jiaxing Key Laboratory of Industrial Intelligence and Digital Twin, Jiaxing Vocational and Technical College, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
This review analyzes multi-objective optimization (MOO) techniques for smart cities, finding hybrid AI and evolutionary methods offer superior adaptability. Challenges remain in generalizability, uncertainty handling, and interpretability for urban planning.
Area of Science:
- Urban Systems Engineering
- Computational Optimization
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Smart cities increasingly rely on complex, interdependent systems for planning and decision-making.
- Multi-objective optimization (MOO) is crucial for enhancing smart city sustainability and real-time operations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and classify MOO techniques applied in smart-city contexts from 2015-2025.
- To benchmark algorithm performance across diverse urban domains.
- To identify research gaps and propose a roadmap for future MOO frameworks.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of 117 peer-reviewed studies.
- Classification of MOO algorithms into four families: bio-inspired, mathematical, physics-inspired, and ML-enhanced.
- Benchmarking based on efficiency, scalability, and suitability for six urban domains (infrastructure, energy, transport, IoT, agriculture, water).
Main Results:
- Established MOO algorithms like NSGA-II and MOED/D are prevalent.
- Hybrid frameworks combining deep learning and evolutionary search show enhanced adaptability in dynamic, high-dimensional smart-city environments.
- Key challenges identified include limited cross-domain generalizability, poor uncertainty handling, and low interpretability of AI-assisted models.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid MOO approaches offer significant potential for smart-city applications.
- Addressing research gaps in privacy, trade-off resolution, digital twin integration, LLMs, and neuromorphic computing is essential.
- A benchmarking toolkit and algorithm-selection matrix are provided to guide practical implementation and future research in scalable, interpretable, and resilient urban optimization.
Related Concept Videos
Manipulation and Analysis
Optimization Problems
Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Machines: Problem Solving I
The toggle clamp system is a machine structure consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that form a stabilized system to transmit forces. The...