Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Variation01:19

Variation

7.7K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
7.7K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.3K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

10.1K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
10.1K
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN202:27

Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2

15.9K
Nucleophilic substitution reactions of alkyl halides can proceed via an SN1 or an SN2 mechanism. While in SN2 reactions, the nucleophile attacks the substrate simultaneously as the leaving group departs, in SN1 reactions, the substrate first dissociates to give the carbocation intermediate. Various factors such as the structure of the substrate, the strength of the nucleophile, and the nature of the solvent promote one mechanism over the other.
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
15.9K
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination02:52

Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination

13.8K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
13.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do Not Forget the Stimulus: A Missing Control in Naturalistic Studies of Neural Entrainment.

eNeuro·2026
Same author

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Early Simultaneous Brain Indexes of Phonological, Semantic, and Pragmatic Information Access in Language Understanding and Production.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Rapid modulation in music supports attention in listeners with attentional difficulties.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Sensory integration, temporal prediction, and rule discovery reflect interdependent inference processes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Shared phonological networks in frontal and temporal cortex for language production and comprehension.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.4K

Predicting meaning in the dyad.

Emilia Kerr1, Benjamin Morillon2, Kristof Strijkers1

  • 1Laboratoire de Parole et Langage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institute of Language, Communication and the Brain, Aix-Marseille Universite.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|September 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Meaning prediction speeds speech in conversations. This effect is stronger when anticipating a partner's reply, highlighting interactive language processing during dyadic communication.

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.7K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.4K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.7K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Social Interaction

Background:

  • Meaning prediction is crucial for efficient language processing.
  • Understanding predictive mechanisms in dyadic interactions is key to explaining fluent communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of meaning prediction in dyadic interactions.
  • To determine if prediction benefits only the speaker or also the listener formulating a response.
  • To differentiate predictive processing in interactive versus isolated language use.

Main Methods:

  • Participants played a semantic association game with manipulated word category predictability.
  • Speech production times were measured for both interlocutors.
  • A control experiment assessed performance in isolation.

Main Results:

  • Predictability accelerated speech production for both participants in dyadic interactions.
  • Meaning prediction significantly enhanced response speed for the replying partner.
  • The enhanced prediction effect for replies disappeared in the isolation experiment.

Conclusions:

  • Dyadic interactions exhibit an incremental prediction effect, benefiting both partners.
  • Interactive language use involves distinct predictive processing compared to individual language use.
  • Findings support theories of joint action and dialog emphasizing mutual linguistic prediction.