Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.1K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.1K
Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview01:27

Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview

2.1K
The protons in unsubstituted alkanes are strongly shielded with chemical shifts below 1.8 ppm. Methine, methylene, and methyl protons appear at approximately 1.7, 1.2 and 0.7 ppm, while the proton signal from methane appears at 0.23 ppm. An electronegative substituent, such as chlorine, withdraws the electron density from the protons, increasing their chemical shift. Progressive substitution of the hydrogens in methane by chlorine shifts the proton signals increasingly downfield, to 3.05 ppm in...
2.1K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

1.8K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synthesis of a Regioisomer of <i>syn</i>-Cryptophane-B: Crystal Structure and Study of Its Chiroptical Properties.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor Concerning "Ultra-Wideband Mid-Infrared Chalcogenide Suspended Nanorib Waveguide Gas Sensors with Exceptionally High External Confinement Factor beyond Free-Space".

ACS nano·2024
Same author

Cation induced changes to the structure of cryptophane cages.

Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)·2024
Same author

A Water-Soluble Cryptophane Decorated with Aromatic Amine Groups Shows High Affinity for Cesium and Thallium(I).

The Journal of organic chemistry·2024
Same author

Sub-ppm Methane Detection with Mid-Infrared Slot Waveguides.

ACS photonics·2023
Same author

Synthesis and Chiroptical Properties of a Chiral Isotopologue of <i>syn</i>-Cryptophane-B.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace
09:03

Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace

Published on: September 6, 2018

13.0K

Rethinking Cryptophane-A for Methane Gas Sensing: Cross-Sensitivity to N2 and CO2 at Ambient Conditions.

Sebastián Alberti1, Thierry Brotin2, Jana Jágerská1

  • 1Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway.

Analytical Chemistry
|September 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Cryptophane-A binds to carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrogen, challenging previous assumptions of methane selectivity. Raman spectroscopy quantified these gas affinities, revealing limitations and potential for sensing applications.

More Related Videos

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

925
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace
09:03

Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace

Published on: September 6, 2018

13.0K
Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

925
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemical Sensing
  • Spectroscopy

Background:

  • Cryptophane-A doped polymer films are used in optical sensors for methane detection.
  • Previous studies claimed selectivity for methane, but practical applicability remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the gas binding affinities of Cryptophane-A using Raman spectroscopy.
  • To challenge existing beliefs regarding cryptophane-methane selectivity and explore nitrogen's role.
  • To quantify relative affinities for atmospheric gases at room temperature.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Raman spectroscopy to analyze gas interactions with Cryptophane-A.
  • Studied binding affinities for carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrogen at room temperature.
  • Quantified relative affinities to establish binding strengths.

Main Results:

  • Cryptophane-A shows measurable affinity for carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrogen.
  • Carbon dioxide exhibits 1.5 times stronger affinity than methane.
  • Nitrogen's relative affinity to methane was determined to be 0.4.

Conclusions:

  • Cryptophane-A is not selective solely for methane, as previously believed.
  • Raman spectroscopy is a valuable tool for studying gas capture in host molecules under ambient conditions.
  • Understanding these affinities is crucial for developing effective cryptophane-based sensing technologies.