Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

1.5K
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
1.5K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.1K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.1K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

1.4K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
1.4K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

1.8K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural and functional connectivity in infancy relate to communication skills at age 2 in children born very preterm.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

A starch-to-sorbitol biorefinery: Impact of oxygenated impurities on the catalytic transfer hydrogenation of starch hydrolysate.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same author

Magnetic Phase Transition Induced Electronic Mirage: Decoding the Six-Petal Orbital Texture in Monolayer 1T-NbSe<sub>2</sub>.

Nano letters·2026
Same author

Multi-Wavelength Machine Learning for High-Precision Colorimetric Sensing.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Robot-guided stereotactic single-stage evacuation of six intracranial abscesses: a rare case report with literature review.

Chinese neurosurgical journal·2026
Same author

Reversing diastolic dysfunction in diabetes: a mitochondrial quality control-centric pharmacological approach.

Acta diabetologica·2026
Same journal

Machine Learning-Assisted Nanopore for Enhanced Fingerprinting Analysis of Functional Glycans.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Maleylpyruvic Acid-Inducible Gene Expression System and Its Application for the Development of Gentisic Acid Biosensor".

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Computer-Aided Rational Hapten Design for Broad-Spectrum Monoclonal Antibody Development against Anthraquinones and Its Application in Lateral Flow Immunoassay.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

One-Step Chemoenzymatic Labeling and Oxime-Reversible Enrichment for O-GlcNAcylation Profiling under Oxidative Stress.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Acid/NIR Dual-Responsive Nanoplatform with AND Logic-Gated Controlled Nitric Oxide Release for Companion Theranostics of Tumors.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Multicharged Foldable Plasma Membrane Probes for Precise Cancer Cell Discrimination and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.

Analytical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.8K

Dual-Channel Microfluidic Photoionization Detector.

Anjali Devi Sivakumar1,2,3,4, Ruchi Sharma1,3,4, Junqi Wang5

  • 1Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

Analytical Chemistry
|October 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new microfluidic differential dual-channel photoionization detector (μDPID) improves gas sensing by reducing noise. This enhanced sensor offers better reliability and performance for microgas chromatography systems.

More Related Videos

Photoelectron Imaging of Anions Illustrated by 310 Nm Detachment of F&#8722;
06:53

Photoelectron Imaging of Anions Illustrated by 310 Nm Detachment of F−

Published on: July 27, 2018

9.1K
Merging Ion Concentration Polarization between Juxtaposed Ion Exchange Membranes to Block the Propagation of the Polarization Zone
08:06

Merging Ion Concentration Polarization between Juxtaposed Ion Exchange Membranes to Block the Propagation of the Polarization Zone

Published on: February 23, 2017

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.8K
Photoelectron Imaging of Anions Illustrated by 310 Nm Detachment of F&#8722;
06:53

Photoelectron Imaging of Anions Illustrated by 310 Nm Detachment of F−

Published on: July 27, 2018

9.1K
Merging Ion Concentration Polarization between Juxtaposed Ion Exchange Membranes to Block the Propagation of the Polarization Zone
08:06

Merging Ion Concentration Polarization between Juxtaposed Ion Exchange Membranes to Block the Propagation of the Polarization Zone

Published on: February 23, 2017

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Microfluidics
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Microfluidic photoionization detectors (μPIDs) are sensitive gas sensors for microgas chromatography (μGC).
  • High electrical impedance in μPIDs makes them vulnerable to noise, limiting performance and bandwidth.
  • Existing μPID technology faces challenges in operational reliability under diverse environmental conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a silicon-based, microfluidic differential dual-channel photoionization detector (μDPID).
  • To enhance noise rejection capabilities and improve operational reliability of gas sensors.
  • To benchmark the μDPID against standard μPID configurations for performance evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Fabrication of a silicon-based, microfluidic differential dual-channel photoionization detector (μDPID).
  • Comparative analysis of μDPID and μPID performance under various noise conditions.
  • Benchmarking noise immunity, linear dynamic range, and bandwidth.

Main Results:

  • The μDPID demonstrated significantly enhanced noise immunity compared to the standard μPID.
  • Achieved a linear dynamic range of approximately 2 × 10^5 (38.5 nA to 0.21 pA).
  • Operated at a large bandwidth of 106 Hz, indicating improved performance.

Conclusions:

  • The developed μDPID effectively rejects common-mode noises, enhancing sensor reliability.
  • The μDPID offers a substantial improvement in dynamic range and bandwidth for gas detection.
  • This technology holds potential for advanced μGC systems, including portable ultrafast GC and 2D GC for trace vapor analysis.