Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression
Published on: January 23, 2017
Optimal asymmetric electric field pulses for selective transcranial magnetic stimulation with minimised power and
Ke Ma1, Andrey Vlasov2, Zeynep B Simsek2
1Department of Engineering, School of Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
Background:
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with asymmetric electric field pulses, such as monophasic, offers directional selectivity for neural activation but requires excessive energy. Previous pulse shape optimisation has been limited to symmetric pulses or heavily constrained variations of conventional waveforms without achieving general optimality in energy efficiency or neural selectivity.
Objective:
We sought to develop a minimally constrained optimisation framework for identifying energy-efficient asymmetric TMS pulses with directional selectivity of neural stimulation.
Methods:
We implemented a novel optimisation framework that incorporates neuron model activation constraints and flexible control of pulse asymmetry. The optimised waveforms were experimentally validated against conventional and previously optimised pulses. We measured motor thresholds for conventional pulses as well as one of the optimised unidirectional rectangular (OUR) pulses and compared its MEP latency for anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) electric field directions in six healthy human subjects.
Results:
The optimised electric field waveforms had leading phases with a time constant of (280±15)μs (mean±SD) and near-rectangular main stimulation phases. They achieved up to respectively 92% and 88% reduction in energy loss and thus heating compared to conventional monophasic pulses and previously improved monophasic-equivalent pulses. In the human experiments, OUR pulses demonstrated similar motor thresholds to monophasic pulses in both AP and PA directions whilst achieving significantly lower energy loss, particularly in the AP direction. Moreover, there was a significant MEP latency difference of (1.79±0.41)ms (mean±SE) between AP and PA direction with OUR pulses, suggesting directional selectivity.
Conclusion:
Our framework successfully identified highly energy-efficient asymmetric pulses for directionally-selective neural engagement. These pulses can enable selective rapid-rate repetitive TMS protocols with reduced power consumption and coil heating, with potential benefits for precision and potency of neuromodulation.
More Related Videos
14:47Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
Published on: April 21, 2023
11:11Protocol for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Symptom Provocation to Treat Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
Published on: November 25, 2025