Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

03:55
Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Visualization in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Thyroid Cancer
Published on: June 9, 2023
935
Surgeon's perceptions on 3D visualization methods in parotid gland tumor surgery
Manon C M Moll1,2, Coralie Arends1, Loes M M Braun3
1Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Frontiers in Oncology
|October 8, 2025
Summary
Three-dimensional (3D) models from MRI data are feasible for visualizing the facial nerve and parotid tumors. Augmented reality (AR) holograms and 2D screen models were preferred over 3D-printed models for surgical planning.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Surgical Planning
- Anatomical Modeling
Background:
- High-resolution MRI and reconstruction techniques enable advanced visualization of the facial nerve and parotid tumors.
- Three-dimensional (3D) anatomical models offer potential for enhanced surgical planning and patient communication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the technical feasibility of creating 3D-printed anatomical models from MRI data.
- To evaluate surgeons' perceptions of 3D models on a 2D screen, 3D-printed models, and augmented reality (AR) holograms for parotid gland tumor surgery.
Main Methods:
- Fifteen surgeons evaluated four clinical cases using conventional MRI, 3D models on a 2D screen, 3D-printed models, and AR holograms.
- Surgeons completed questionnaires assessing anatomical clarity, clinical utility, perceived usefulness, and ease of use.
- Statistical analyses included Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Spearman correlations.
Main Results:
- AR holograms received the highest scores for tumor visibility; all methods showed equal anatomical landmark visibility.
- 3D visualizations influenced surgical approach decisions and perceived risk of facial nerve injury.
- Screen-based 3D models and conventional MRI were rated highest for patient consultation and preoperative planning; AR and 2D screen models scored highest for usefulness and ease of use.
Conclusions:
- 3D-printed models of the facial nerve and tumors are technically feasible, aiding preoperative consultation and planning.
- 3D-printed models were perceived as less effective than 2D screen or AR visualizations.
- While valuable adjuncts, 3D models do not replace conventional MRI for surgical planning.

