Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

499
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
499

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Study on the Evaluation of Ultrasonic Propagation Properties and Nonlinearity According to Temperature Changes of Aluminium Alloys for Each Aluminium Alloy by Temperature.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Assessment of the Influence of the Geometrical Shape of the Damper on the Efficiency of an Ultrasonic Operation Piezoelectric Transducer.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Ultrasonic Nonlinearity Experiment due to Plastic Deformation of Aluminum Plate Due to Bending Damage.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Numerical and Experimental Analysis of DVA on the Flexible-Rigid Rail Vehicle Carbody Resonant Vibration.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Human Gait Recognition: A Single Stream Optimal Deep Learning Features Fusion.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

A Study on Fatigue State Evaluation of Rail by the Use of Ultrasonic Nonlinearity.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.6K

Deep Learning-Based Approach for Automatic Defect Detection in Complex Structures Using PAUT Data.

Kseniia Barshok1, Jung-In Choi2, Jaesun Lee3

  • 1Research Institute of DNA+, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Republic of Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated defect detection in complex structures is improved using phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) and deep learning. A novel Convolutional Attention Temporal Transformer for Sequences (CATT-S) model achieves 99.4% accuracy, enhancing non-destructive testing reliability.

Keywords:
CATT-Sdeep learningdefect detectionphased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT)

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.6K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Non-Destructive Testing
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Automated defect detection in complex structures is crucial for ensuring material integrity.
  • Traditional signal processing methods for phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) face limitations in noisy environments.
  • Deep learning offers potential for enhanced accuracy in analyzing PAUT data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and compare automated defect detection methods using PAUT data.
  • To evaluate traditional signal processing and various deep learning architectures.
  • To introduce and validate a novel Convolutional Attention Temporal Transformer for Sequences (CATT-S) model.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented an improved signal-to-noise ratio algorithm with automatic depth gate calculation as a baseline.
  • Developed and trained fully connected networks (FCN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and the CATT-S model.
  • Utilized diverse datasets including simulated CIVA data and real-world data from welded and composite specimens.

Main Results:

  • The improved SNR algorithm showed robust flaw indication but struggled with noisy data.
  • CNN achieved 94.9% test accuracy, effectively capturing local PAUT signal features.
  • The CATT-S model outperformed baselines with 99.4% accuracy and a 0.905 F1-score, modeling both morphology and inter-beam dependencies.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning, particularly the CATT-S model, significantly improves automated defect detection in complex structures using PAUT.
  • The CATT-S model's ability to capture fine-grained signal morphology and long-range dependencies is key to its superior performance.
  • This integrated approach holds substantial practical potential for reliable and efficient non-destructive testing (NDT) of heterogeneous materials.