Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

695
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
695
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

876
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
876
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

752
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
752
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

690
A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
690
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

27.3K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
27.3K
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

810
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
810

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emotion-Aware Contextual Modelling for Robust Driver Fatigue Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Using Gesture Recognition for AGV Control: Preliminary Research.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Moisture Determination for Fine-Sized Copper Ore by Computer Vision and Thermovision Methods.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Measurement-Based Modelling of Material Moisture and Particle Classification for Control of Copper Ore Dry Grinding Process.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Chladni Figures in Modal Analysis of a Double-Panel Structure.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.1K

Performance Analysis of Keypoints Detection and Description Algorithms for Stereo Vision Based Odometry.

Sebastian Budzan1, Roman Wyżgolik1, Michał Lysko1

  • 1Department of Measurements and Control Systems, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary

For stereo vision odometry in dynamic settings, GFTT keypoint detection offers the best speed-accuracy balance. It outperforms other methods like FAST and ORB for real-world trajectory estimation.

Keywords:
BRISKGFTTKAZEORBSLAMkeypoint descriptionkeypoint detectionvisual odometry

More Related Videos

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.4K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.1K
Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.4K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Robotics
  • Sensor Fusion

Background:

  • Stereo vision odometry is crucial for robot navigation.
  • Keypoint detection and description algorithms significantly impact odometry performance.
  • Dynamic environments pose challenges due to motion and appearance variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate keypoint algorithms for stereo vision odometry.
  • To analyze algorithm performance under various image conditions and dynamic scenarios.
  • To provide guidance for selecting optimal keypoint methods in real-time applications.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of FAST, GFTT, ORB, BRISK, and KAZE keypoint algorithms.
  • Utilized the KITTI dataset for quantitative analysis.
  • Assessed detection accuracy, robustness, computational efficiency, and matching quality.
  • Examined trajectory error (drift) in simulated dynamic conditions.

Main Results:

  • FAST and ORB detected the most keypoints.
  • GFTT demonstrated the optimal balance between matching quality and processing speed.
  • KAZE offered high robustness but with increased computational cost.
  • Image variations (resolution, noise, blur, contrast) impacted performance differently across algorithms.

Conclusions:

  • GFTT is the most suitable keypoint algorithm for trajectory estimation in dynamic environments.
  • Algorithm selection involves trade-offs between speed, accuracy, and robustness.
  • Findings offer practical insights for real-time stereo visual odometry system design.