Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Growth and Electrostatic/chemical Properties of Metal/LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Heterostructures
Published on: February 8, 2018
Weak temperature dependence of orbital Hall angle in Ta/Ni bilayers
Tianren Luo1,2,3, Qingtao Xia1,2, Junda Qu1,2
1Fert Beijing Institute, MIIT Key Laboratory of Spintronics, School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People's Republic of China.
None:
In spintronics, characterizing the temperature dependence of spin Hall angle (SHA) has been a common method to explore the underlying mechanisms of spin Hall effect (SHE). However, the experimental reports of orbital Hall effect (OHE) under varying temperatures remain limited. Here, we systematically investigate the effective charge-to-spin conversion efficiencyθHin Ta/Ni and Ta/CoFeB bilayers across the temperature ranging from 10 K to 300 K, where theθHrepresents the combined contribution of the SHA and the orbital Hall angle (OHA). TheθHof Ta/Ni remains positive across the investigated temperature range, indicating that the OHE dominates over the SHE. The Ta/CoFeB sample serves as a reference with negligible OHE, exhibiting negative values ofθHthat are consistent with the SHA of Ta. As temperature decreases, theθHof both Ta/Ni and Ta/CoFeB increase with similar trends. Due to the significantly smaller difference of SHAs in Ta/Ni and Ta/CoFeB compared to those of OHAs, we suggest that the similar trends ofθHdemonstrate the weak temperature dependence of OHA in Ta/Ni. This finding advances the comprehensive understanding of OHE and may pave the way for the application of orbitronics.
Related Concept Videos
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
Molecular Orbital Theory II
¹H NMR of Conformationally Flexible Molecules: Variable-Temperature NMR
The Hall Effect
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

