Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
Developing and validating measures of take-home methadone with administrative data
Shashi N Kapadia1, Kenneth Karan2, Hao Zhang3
1Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10021, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
New methods using Medicaid claims data can effectively measure take-home methadone (THM) treatment for opioid use disorder. These validated indicators allow for better assessment of THM uptake and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Substance Abuse Treatment
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Take-home methadone (THM) has become more flexible since 2020, offering innovative treatment for opioid use disorder.
- Current insurance claims data lack established methods for accurately measuring THM.
- This study aimed to develop and validate candidate measures for THM using claims data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and validate candidate indicators for measuring take-home methadone (THM) treatment using Medicaid insurance claims data.
- To assess the performance of these candidate indicators against a gold-standard measure.
- To determine the extent to which variation between treatment programs explains overall variation in THM receipt.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 2020 Medicaid data from four states, analyzing treatment episodes for individuals aged 18-64.
- Defined THM receipt based on a gold-standard indicator (≥6 consecutive days of THM in the second month of treatment).
- Developed four candidate indicators based on intervals between in-clinic methadone administrations and evaluated their sensitivity and specificity against the gold-standard.
Main Results:
- The study analyzed 4836 treatment episodes, with 14% involving THM.
- Candidate indicators demonstrated high sensitivity (65-100%) and specificity (80-96%).
- The most sensitive indicator identified THM with any ≥7-day gap between administrations; the most specific required two consecutive ≥7-day gaps of equal length. Between-program variation accounted for 38.6-48.3% of THM receipt variation.
Conclusions:
- Two proposed indicators for measuring THM using Medicaid claims data show excellent performance.
- These validated measures provide a reliable method for assessing THM uptake and patient outcomes in opioid use disorder treatment.
More Related Videos
09:16A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
07:50A Method for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Ethanol in Rats without Water Deprivation, Saccharin Fading or Extended Access Training
Published on: January 29, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Drug Concentrations: Measurements
Plasma...