Advantages of Single-Position Surgery over Posterior Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Single-position surgery with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) is gaining attention for its reduced invasiveness. We developed SPAPS, a technique allowing two surgeons to perform anterior LLIF and posterior PPS insertion simultaneously in a single lateral decubitus position. This retrospective study compared SPAPS (SPAPS-LLIF, Group SL) and minimally invasive posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF/TLIF, Group PT) in patients treated between 2016 and 2019 with a two-year follow-up. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), JOABPEQ and VAS scores, segmental lordotic angle, lumbar lordotic angle, segmental Cobb's angle, PPS misplacement, PPS loosening, fusion status, and muscle cross-sectional areas were compared. Fifty-two patients were analyzed (Group SL: 25; Group PT: 27). SPAPS significantly reduced operative time (118.0 vs. 165.3 min, p <0.01) and estimated blood loss (8.6 vs. 164.1 mL, p<0.01). While clinical outcomes and hospital stay were comparable, Group SL had significantly lower PPS loosening (0% vs. 13%, p<0.01) and non-union rates (0% vs. 22.2%, p=0.02). Multifidus muscle atrophy was also less in Group SL (-14.3 vs. -121.5 mm2, p<0.01). SPAPS demonstrated advantages in reducing surgical invasiveness without compromising clinical efficacy, offering a promising alternative to conventional posterior fusion surgery.