Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
The perioperative education time-out and its impact on patient safety outcomes
Olivia A Moumne1, Gentry C Carter2, Tsyiva J Devereaux2
1University of Utah Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the time the Study Was Performed, 50 N Medical Dr, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, USA. olivia.moumne@hsc.utah.edu.
Background:
Clear communication between members of the surgical team is necessary for perioperative patient safety. Miscommunication in the operating room (OR) is common between attendings and residents. It's unknown whether surgical education tools targeted at improving communication between faculty and residents, such as an Education Time-Out (ETO), can also improve patient safety outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact of the ETO on patient safety outcomes during and after gynecologic surgery.
Methods:
From April to June 2022, we recruited and enrolled primary and adjunct gynecologic surgical faculty from any sub-specialty associated with the University of Utah OBGYN residency program. Enrollment included a simulation to practice the ETO. We then abstracted safety outcomes from patient records of participating faculty 6 months pre-intervention and 9 months post-intervention. Our primary outcome was a composite score of 30-day morbidity and mortality We compared pre- and post-intervention complication rates using paired t-tests. Logistic regression assessed the likelihood of experiencing a complication pre- and post- intervention. Study conducted on surgeries performed at 4 hospitals where University of Utah residents operate. We reviewed 1409 charts: 572 pre-intervention and 837 post-intervention from 25 surgeons.
Results:
Type of surgical case was similar between pre- and post-intervention groups with 20% vs 18% gynecology oncology surgeries and 40% vs 41% major surgeries, respectively. Bivariate analysis showed a non-significant improvement in composite patient safety outcomes overall (pre = 9.8%, post = 8.1%, p = 0.3). Adjusted analysis showed surgical cases post-intervention were 24% less likely to experience a complication (OR = .76, 95%CI = 0.5-1.1, p = 0.2). Cancer and major surgery indicators strongly predicted complications both pre- and post-intervention.
Conclusions:
We did not find a significant improvement in patient outcomes; however, we were not powered for outcomes and as a pilot study the trend toward improvement in patient safety outcomes following ETO implementation is promising.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
