Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Standardizing the Development of Amine-Based Silica Composites as CO2 Adsorbents for Direct Air Capture
Published on: September 29, 2023
Comparative Technoeconomic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Reactive Carbon Capture-to-Methanol
Jonathan A Martin1, Eric C D Tan1, Daniel A Ruddy1
1National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.
None:
Our group recently developed dual-function materials (DFMs) and reactive carbon capture (RCC) processes for the selective production of methanol (MeOH) or CO, offering two novel and unique pathways for MeOH production. This study conducted a comparative techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the two RCC pathways from exhaust CO2: 1) a "Direct RCC-to-MeOH" pathway and 2) an "Indirect RCC-to-CO" pathway followed by MeOH synthesis. The "Direct RCC-to-MeOH" pathway produced a lower levelized cost of MeOH (LCOM) at $0.78/kg, compared to $0.84/kg for the "Indirect RCC-to-CO" pathway. The key difference is the need to recompress the syngas from RCC before MeOH synthesis in "Indirect RCC-to-CO." Nonetheless, with reduced catalyst costs and hydrogen requirements for "RCC-to-CO," this pathway merits further study to produce syngas rather than MeOH. Both pathways are comparable in LCOM to baseline e-MeOH production from CO2 hydrogenation ($0.72/kg) while having lower carbon intensities (0.45 and 0.51 kg-CO2e/kg vs 0.54 kg-CO2e/kg).
Related Concept Videos
Thermal and Photochemical Electrocyclic Reactions: Overview
Carbon-dioxide Fixation

