Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Large-scale Top-down Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Published on: October 24, 2018
Comparative Analysis of Proteoform Clean-Up Methods for In-Depth Top-Down Proteomics.
Alyssa A Williams1, Kendalyn N Firenza2, Amy K Carfagno1
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Top-down proteomics (TDP) benefits from efficient sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) removal. This study benchmarks commercial kits against methanol-chloroform-water (MCW) precipitation, finding Minute SDS offers broad proteome coverage at a lower cost.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Proteomics
Background:
- Proteoforms, encompassing genetic and post-translational variations, are crucial for understanding biological mechanisms and disease.
- Top-down proteomics (TDP) analyzes intact proteoforms, often requiring sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for fractionation.
- Efficient SDS removal is critical as it interferes with mass spectrometry analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark four commercial SDS clean-up kits against traditional methanol-chloroform-water (MCW) precipitation for TDP.
- To evaluate SDS removal efficiency, proteoform recovery, post-translational modification (PTM) retention, and ease of use.
- To provide practical guidance for optimizing TDP sample preparation workflows.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of four commercial SDS clean-up kits (DetergentOUT, HiPPR, Minute SDS, SurfactAway) with methanol-chloroform-water (MCW) precipitation.
- Assessment of SDS removal efficacy using mass spectrometry-based techniques.
- Evaluation of proteoform identification numbers, focusing on recovery of small and acidic proteoforms.
- Analysis of PTMs, particularly methylation, across different clean-up methods.
Main Results:
- MCW precipitation resulted in fewer proteoform identifications, especially for small and acidic proteoforms.
- Commercial kits DetergentOUT and HiPPR showed SDS removal comparable to MCW but at a higher cost.
- Minute SDS and SurfactAway kits enabled the identification of a higher number of proteoforms.
- Increased prevalence of methylation modifications was observed post-MCW clean-up.
Conclusions:
- For studies sensitive to the loss of low molecular weight or acidic proteoforms, commercial kits like DetergentOUT and HiPPR may offer advantages.
- Minute SDS provides a cost-effective alternative with sufficient SDS removal and broader proteome coverage.
- These findings support the development of more streamlined, reproducible, and accessible TDP workflows for biological and clinical research.
More Related Videos
11:12Organic Solvent-Based Protein Precipitation for Robust Proteome Purification Ahead of Mass Spectrometry
Published on: February 7, 2022
10:37Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
Published on: November 15, 2017