Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Balancing the scales: predictors of performance and the long-term impact of a robotic surgery curriculum.

Surgical endoscopyĀ·2026
Same author

Minimally Invasive Surgery/Robotic Surgery in Small Bowel Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North AmericaĀ·2026
Same authorSame journal

Small Incisions, Big Impact-Robotic Surgery Is Revolutionizing Cancer Care.

Surgical oncology clinics of North AmericaĀ·2026
Same author

Delayed gastric emptying after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: the Transatlantic Robot Pancreas Consortium (TROPANC).

Surgical endoscopyĀ·2026
Same author

Impact of Surgical Approach on Post-Pancreatoduodenectomy Bleeding: A Multi-Center Analysis.

Annals of surgeryĀ·2026
Same author

Minimally invasive surgery for small-bowel gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors over 5 cm: A safe and feasible approach.

SurgeryĀ·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy
10:34

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: November 20, 2021

6.0K

Techniques for Robotic Pancreatectomy.

Caroline Rieser1, Sarah Hays1, Melissa E Hogg2

  • 1Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem/Endeavor Health, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Room 2539, Walgreen Building, Evanston, IL 60201, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Room O-217, MC6040, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|November 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Robotic surgery is a feasible, safe, and oncologically sound approach for minimally invasive pancreatectomy, offering improved perioperative outcomes compared to open surgery.

Keywords:
Distal pancreatectomyMinimally invasive surgeryPancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic surgerySurgical outcomes

More Related Videos

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
10:58

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy

Published on: June 2, 2018

8.5K
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy
10:34

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: November 20, 2021

6.0K
Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
10:58

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy

Published on: June 2, 2018

8.5K
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Robotic surgery has advanced minimally invasive techniques in pancreatic surgery over the past 20 years.
  • Robotic distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy are increasingly utilized procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey the current literature on robotic pancreatectomy.
  • To detail the approach for oncologic pancreatic resection using robotic assistance.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of robotic pancreatectomy studies.
  • Analysis of perioperative outcomes and oncologic equivalence.

Main Results:

  • Robotic pancreatic surgery is technically feasible and safe.
  • Oncologic outcomes are equivalent to open surgery.
  • Improved perioperative results are associated with the robotic approach.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic pancreatectomy represents a viable and effective alternative to open surgery.
  • The adoption of robotic systems enhances minimally invasive pancreatic cancer resections.