Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
What's in It for Me? Beliefs About Relative Costs to Well-Being Explain Why People Deprioritize Moral Improvements
Jessie Sun1, Jonathan Z Berman2
1Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract:
Most people are interested in improving themselves, but they show less interest in improving on moral traits. Why don't people particularly want to be more moral, and why do people prioritize improving certain traits more than others? Across four preregistered studies of U.K.-based CloudResearch (NStudy 1 = 252; NSupplemental = 110) and Behavioral Research Lab (NStudy 2a = 303, NStudy 2b = 301) participants, we test four classes of explanations. Results rule out explanations based on the ideas that moral traits are seen as more difficult to change and as either more or less causally central. Instead, people are less interested in moral improvements because they believe (a) that they are already highly moral and (b) that nonmoral improvements would more effectively improve their happiness and goal attainment. These results clarify the perceived tradeoffs between well-being and morality and show that personal well-being is a central motivation for personality change.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Egoism and Altruism
Motivational Bias
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Benefits of Self-Esteem

