Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

A High-Fidelity Porcine Model of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Following Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: June 6, 2025
Trends in Left Ventricular Assist Device Utilization and Survival Outcomes Following the Donor Allocation Policy
Christopher D Pritting1,2, Daler Rahimov1, Matthew P Weber1,3
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
The UNOS policy revision led to decreased durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use. Patients on LVADs experienced worse waitlist and post-transplant survival after the policy change.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) revised its donor heart allocation policy.
- This study examines the impact of this policy revision on durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) utilization and patient outcomes.
- Trends in LVAD use, waitlist survival, and post-transplant survival were analyzed in relation to the policy change.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate trends in durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use among heart transplant candidates.
- To evaluate the association between the UNOS donor heart allocation policy revision and LVAD utilization.
- To compare waitlist and post-transplant survival rates for LVAD-supported patients before and after the policy revision.
Main Methods:
- Adult patients implanted with HeartMate II, HeartWare HVAD, or HeartMate 3 LVADs and listed for heart transplantation were identified in the UNOS database.
- Patients were stratified into pre- and post-policy revision groups (October 18, 2013 - June 16, 2023).
- Exclusion criteria included temporary support, other mechanical circulatory support devices, donation after circulatory death hearts, and multiorgan transplants. Waitlist and post-transplant survival were compared.
Main Results:
- LVAD use decreased at listing (28% to 24.5%) and at transplant (45.8% to 31.7%) post-policy revision.
- A higher proportion of LVAD patients underwent transplantation post-policy (89.6% to 94.3%).
- Overall waitlist and post-transplant survival for LVAD-supported patients significantly worsened after the policy change (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- The UNOS policy revision was associated with a decline in durable LVAD utilization.
- LVAD-supported patients experienced worse waitlist and post-transplant survival outcomes in the post-policy era.
- The findings highlight potential adverse effects of the allocation policy on outcomes for patients requiring mechanical circulatory support.
More Related Videos
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction