Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Effective Communication Training Needs Among US State and Local Public Health Professionals: Findings From the 2024
Jessica Owens-Young1, Jonathon P Leider
1Author Affiliations: Department of Public and Allied Health, Center for Urban Health Equity, School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Owens-Young); and Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Leider).
Objective:
To assess perceptions of effective communication training needs among US state and local government public health employees and examine variations across generations and other worker characteristics.
Design:
Cross-sectional survey analysis using data from the 2024 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey.
Setting:
State health agencies and local health departments across 48 states in the US.
Participants:
A total of 56 595 state and local government public health employees (37% response rate) representing 4 generations: Baby boomers (16%), Gen X (39%), millennials (38%), and Gen Z (7%).
Main Outcome Measures:
Training needs for effective communication, defined as the combination of ability to communicate effectively across audiences and ability to communicate persuasively. Training needs were identified when respondents rated skills as moderately or very important but reported being unable to perform or at beginner level.
Results:
Overall, 11% of respondents identified a training need for effective communication, including 7% with gaps in communicating effectively with different audiences and 9% in persuasive communication. Gen Z staff ranked persuasive communication as their top training need regardless of skill level. Logistic regression revealed that Communications and Policy staff (adjusted odds ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.21-1.76) and Environmental Health staff (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 1.04-1.37) had higher odds of prioritizing communication training. Women and older generations were less likely to prioritize communication training compared to men and Gen Z, respectively.
Conclusions:
Although effective communication was identified as a training need, respondents did not consistently identify effective communication as their top perceived training need. Given the importance of communication to effective public health practice, training interventions should be tailored to different generations, roles, and programmatic areas.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Health Literacy
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...