Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
Published on: December 18, 2016
Checking the Box: The Association between "Problem List Reviewed" and Outdated Diagnoses on the List
Jodi Simon1,2, Jeffrey Panzer1,3, Abbey Ekong3
1Research & Evaluation, AllianceChicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
None:
Problem lists are intended to support high-quality care, but are often long and outdated. Despite policy efforts to encourage their upkeep-such as the "Problem List Reviewed" attestation checkbox in electronic health records (EHRs)-many diagnoses remain on lists far longer than clinically appropriate. Clinicians often check the attestation box that problem lists have been reviewed to comply with performance measures without reviewing and modifying the list.This study aimed to assess whether attestation of "Problem List Reviewed" is associated with shorter duration of short-term (acute and billing-related) diagnoses on problem lists.Multi-method study including retrospective EHR data from 892,329 patient visits at 24 Federally Qualified Health Centers across the United States and chart review data. Participants included adult patients with 2+ primary care visits during the study period. The primary outcome was the duration that short-term diagnoses remained on the problem list. The secondary outcome was the relationship between duration and attestation of review.Diagnoses persisted on problem lists far beyond their expected clinical duration (e.g., acute pharyngitis: median 343 days; urinary tract infection: 443 days). For 6 of 12 conditions, attestation was associated with significantly longer duration (e.g., pharyngitis: 371 days with attestation vs. 302.5 without, p < 0.001). Only one code ("Encounter for Screening") was associated with shorter duration when attested (p = 0.016). Chart reviews revealed minimal evidence of problem list management during visits.Checking the "Problem List Reviewed" box is not associated with the appropriate removal of short-term diagnoses and may paradoxically contribute to their persistence. Incentive structures focused on clinician attestation of problem list review are counterproductive. Improving the design and functionality of problem lists is likely a better way to maintain concise, up-to-date lists that drive care and focus attention. Expecting clinicians to keep problem lists clean by adding an attestation check box is likely misguided.
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR

