Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Minimally Invasive Murine Laryngoscopy for Close-Up Imaging of Laryngeal Motion During Breathing and Swallowing
Published on: December 1, 2023
Unrevealing the sequence of dysphagia progression in ALS: an event-based, FEES-driven staging approach
Giammarco Milella1,2, Maria Luisa Fiorella3, Vittorio Velucci4
1Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, Bari, 70124, Italy.
None:
Dysphagia drives morbidity and mortality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), yet staging systems treat it as a binary milestone and do not capture its trajectory. Reports diverge on the earliest abnormality, with some citing cohesive-bolus inefficiency and others thin-liquid impairment. Furthermore, how these findings relate to patient-perceived dysphagia remains unclear. In a prospective cohort, 78 incident ALS patients underwent one or more fiberoptic endoscopic evaluations of swallowing (FEES), yielding 108 assessments. Pharyngeal residue for four consistencies was rated with a validated scale. An event-based model (EBM) inferred the temporal order of abnormalities and defined a five-stage, FEES-based dysphagia staging system (DSS). Construct, convergent, discriminant, and prognostic validity were tested against established measures; responsiveness was assessed in patients with longitudinal FEES. The EBM identified a consistent sequence of swallowing impairment: solids, semisolids, liquids, saliva. Patient-perceived dysphagia occurred in 38% of DSS 1-2 evaluations versus 100% of DSS 3-4. The DSS showed construct validity by distinguishing bulbar- from spinal-onset ALS and convergent validity with the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore and LMN bulbar score. Discriminant validity was supported by weak, non-significant associations with spinal/respiratory measures. Agreement with King's staging was moderate, and all King's stage IV patients mapped to DSS stages 3-4. The DSS was responsive to change (Stuart-Maxwell χ² = 11.034; p = 0.026). The EBM reconciles prior discrepancies: pathophysiology begins with solids, whereas symptom recognition typically coincides with liquid-phase residue. The FEES-based DSS is reproducible and clinically meaningful for tracking bulbar involvement and identifying higher-risk patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Deglutition
Swallowing can be divided into three stages: the voluntary phase, the pharyngeal phase, and the esophageal phase. Although the...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:

