Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy of the Urinary Tract: The Technique
Published on: January 10, 2013
Laser applications in endourology: Endocorporeal laser lithotripsy during ureteroscopy
Frédéric Panthier1, Steeve Doizi2, Laurent Berthe3
1Endolase Lab, GRC n(o) 20-Sorbonne Université, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 75020 Paris, France; Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75020 Paris, France; PIMM, UMR 8006 CNRS-Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 151, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Endourology Technology Section of European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, Netherlands; Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), Paris, France.
Background:
Laser energy has become the preferred option to treat urinary stones during ureteroscopy (URS), rigid or flexible (FURS). Tis review aimed to report the outcomes of endocorporeal laser lithotripsy (ELL) during URS, as well as laser settings.
Methods:
A literature review was conducted up to April 2025 with no time limit on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. A narrative synthesis is presented for clarity.
Results:
Only pulsed Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG), Thulium Fiber (TFL), and Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG) lasers are effective for ELL during URS. They present similar stone-free rates (SFR, residual fragments<3mm) during FURS. TFL is associated with the best zero-fragment rates (ZFR, residual fragments<1mm). Technological nuances need to be addressed to explain the variations in surgical technique and outcomes: TFL has a low peak power (500W max) and 150μm fibers providing finer dusting abilities than Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG. Conversely, Ho:YAG offers excellent fragmentation abilities, useful for hard stones such as cystine ones. p-Tm:YAG represents a compromise enabling both dusting and fragmentation of all stone types. Laser settings should be individualized beginning with treatment objective, and peak power. A low-energy (0.5J)-low-frequency (5Hz) test then allows adjustment of fracture level via energy and treatment speed via frequency (≤10Hz/W in ureter, ≤30Hz/W in renal cavities).
Conclusion:
Ho:YAG, TFL, and more recently p-Tm:YAG are indispensable tools for ELL during URS, with similar SFR. However, TFL has reported the best ZFR. The development of suction devices is expected to revolutionize ELL in URS.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

