Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Immune Monitoring in Critical Care Patients Using Whole Blood Assays
Published on: September 20, 2024
Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Histoplasmosis Across Clinical Syndromes and Immune Statuses
Nicolas Barros1,2, Mitch McClean1, Elisa Sarmiento1
1Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Background:
Histoplasmosis, caused by Histoplasma capsulatum, presents with a broad clinical spectrum from asymptomatic infection to disseminated disease (DH). Diagnostic modalities, culture, histopathology, antigen detection, and serologic testing, vary in performance. We evaluated their sensitivity and specificity across clinical presentations and immune statuses.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective diagnostic study of adults evaluated at Indiana University Health Medical Center who had serum and/or urine submitted for Histoplasma antigen testing to Miravista Diagnostics. Clinical classification (proven, probable) was based on laboratory, imaging, and clinical data according to EORTC/MSG criteria. Controls were patients tested for histoplasmosis but found to have an alternative diagnosis. Diagnostic methods included antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA), antibody EIA (IgG/IgM), immunodiffusion (ID), complement fixation (CF), and fungal cultures.
Results:
Among 205 patients, 125 were classified as histoplasmosis (54 proven, 71 probable) and 80 as controls. Antigen EIA in serum and/or urine had sensitivity 121/124 (97.6%) and specificity 75/80 (93.7%). IgG/IgM antibody EIA detected 89/111 (80.2%) cases with specificity 73/79 (92.4%) at a 20 EU/mL cutoff. Combining antigen and antibody testing increased sensitivity to 109/110 (99.1%). Among 75 patients with both serum and urine antigen tested, combined testing added 3/75 (4%) cases beyond urine alone. Antibody sensitivity declined in immunocompromised patients (75.0% vs 93.3% in immunocompetent, P = .0134), while antigen sensitivity remained high across groups.
Conclusions:
Histoplasma antigen testing is the most sensitive diagnostic method. Antibody testing complements antigen in selected populations, particularly immunocompetent patients with pulmonary disease. Culture remains a complementary but less sensitive tool.
Insights
Histoplasma antigen testing is the most sensitive diagnostic method for histoplasmosis. Antibody testing offers complementary value, especially in immunocompetent individuals, while cultures remain less sensitive.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Microbiology
Background:
- Histoplasmosis, caused by *Histoplasma capsulatum*, exhibits a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic infection to disseminated disease.
- Current diagnostic methods, including culture, histopathology, antigen detection, and serologic testing, possess variable performance characteristics.
- Evaluation of diagnostic test performance across diverse clinical presentations and patient immune statuses is crucial for effective management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic modalities for histoplasmosis.
- To compare the performance of antigen detection and antibody testing in different patient populations.
- To determine the optimal diagnostic strategy for histoplasmosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective diagnostic study involving adults tested for *Histoplasma* antigen.
- Classification of patients as histoplasmosis (proven/probable) or controls based on EORTC/MSG criteria.
- Assessment of antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA), antibody EIA (IgG/IgM), immunodiffusion (ID), complement fixation (CF), and fungal cultures.
Main Results:
- *Histoplasma* antigen EIA demonstrated high sensitivity (97.6%) and specificity (93.7%).
- Antibody EIA sensitivity was 80.2%, with reduced performance in immunocompromised patients (75.0% vs. 93.3%).
- Combined antigen and antibody testing achieved 99.1% sensitivity; antigen testing alone was highly effective.
Conclusions:
- *Histoplasma* antigen testing is the most sensitive diagnostic method.
- Antibody testing serves as a valuable adjunct, particularly in immunocompetent patients with pulmonary disease.
- Fungal culture remains a complementary diagnostic tool but is less sensitive than antigen detection.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

