Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Delay in Care for Gynecologic Oncology Patients With Limited English Proficiency
Maya Gross1, Kemi M Doll, Isabel Rodriguez
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Objective:
To evaluate referral patterns and care delay for the growing population of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) who seek treatment with gynecologic oncologists.
Methods:
This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients seen by gynecologic oncologists at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center from 2013 to 2024 (referral cohort). Our primary outcome was the time to receipt of first treatment after the initial referral, by LEP status (among patients receiving treatment with a gynecologic oncologist-the treatment cohort) and with delay categorized using 4- and 6-week cutoffs. We compared referral patterns and sociodemographic, clinical, and temporal data by LEP status , defined as documented need for an interpreter. We employed χ 2 tests for categorical variables and two-sided t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. Multivariable linear regression was performed.
Results:
Of 9,915 patients seen for consultation, 5.8% (n=573) had LEP. Patients with LEP were significantly more likely to have referrals originating from the emergency department (6.5% vs 1.0%, P <.001), require multiple referrals to a gynecologic oncologist before initial consultation (9.4% vs 5.1%, P <.001), and be referred to other obstetrics and gynecology specialties before reaching gynecologic oncology (15.9% vs 8.7%, P <.001). Of 5,329 patients who received treatment with gynecologic oncologists, those with LEP were more likely to experience delays in receiving treatment after the initial diagnosis-related referral (63.2% with LEP vs 52.4% without LEP waiting more than 4 weeks, P <.001; 43.5% with LEP vs 35.7% without LEP waiting more than 6 weeks, P <.001). The time from consultation to treatment did not differ by language status. After adjusting for race, insurance status, and ethnicity, the time from referral to treatment remained 16.0% longer for patients with LEP.
Conclusion:
In this large, diverse cohort, patients with LEP experienced inequitable, cumulative health care delays. Inefficient referral patterns created delay before initial gynecologic oncology consultation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Health Literacy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.

