Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Dealing with differential misclassification of an outcome or a covariate in association studies with an internally
Júlia Lacombe Ossó1, Benjamin Glemain1,2, Céline Dorival1
1Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie Et de Santé Publique, 27 Rue Chaligny, 75571, Cedex 12, Paris, France.
Background:
To present an analytical framework for correcting misclassification when an imperfect test is used as an indicator of a disease in association studies, taking into account that part of the sample has joint test and disease data.
Methods:
We explored two scenarios, depending on whether the disease is a covariate or the outcome. The analysis sample includes an internal validation sample where the disease status is known in addition to the test. Joint likelihood models taking into account classification errors and the possible selection of the validation sample not at random were used. Simulations were performed to evaluate the methods. We illustrated our framework using data from a multi-cohort COVID-19 serological study conducted in France between 2020 and 2021, with serology as the imperfect test and SARS-CoV-2 infection as the disease. The dataset included concomitant measurements of the serological test and the SARS-CoV-2 infection status determined using additional virologic methods (PCR, neutralization assay) in 7% participants. We estimated 1) the association between incident persistent symptoms defined as a symptom lasting at least 8 weeks (outcome) and infection (covariate) and 2) the association between infection (outcome) and several covariates. For comparison, we also estimated 'naïve' models using serology without correction or using the internal validation sample only, as well as models under different assumptions about the missingness pattern of the SARS-CoV-2 infection status.
Results:
Simulations confirmed the methods' abilities to correct for misclassification and not at random selection of the validation sample. In the application, the estimated sensitivities and specificities of the serological test with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection were 86.2%-87.7% and 95.8%-97.5%, respectively. Considering SARS-CoV-2 infection as a covariate, the corrected analysis identified a significant association between infection and persistent symptoms. Considering SARS-CoV-2 infection as the outcome, the corrected analysis identified an association between infection and age, gender and active smoking, but did not retrieve an association with living with at least one child at home and previous smoking, which were identified in the naïve analysis.
Conclusion:
This methodological framework can be applied in association studies when an imperfect test is used as an indicator of a disease and the disease status has been validated in a subset of the sample. We extended previous works to deal with not at random selection of this validated sample.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies