Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Using Continuous Data Tracking Technology to Study Exercise Adherence in Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Published on: November 8, 2013
Opportunities for Predicting Lung Cancer Screening Nonadherence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yannan Lin1, Ruiwen Ding1, Drew Moghanaki2
1Medical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Purpose:
The low adherence rate to annual lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces potential mortality benefits. Interventions to improve adherence often do not consider individualized risk for nonadherence, which is vital in informing the design of tailored interventions. The authors systematically reviewed the literature and conducted a meta-analysis on predicting LCS nonadherence risk using machine learning.
Methods:
The authors searched citation databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for original studies that mentioned LCS nonadherence risk assessment between April 28, 2014, and May 8, 2025. Study characteristics, nonadherence information, and prediction model performance were extracted. The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD420251049715).
Results:
Nine studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included in this systematic review, with sample sizes varying between 168 and 28,294, from various institutional settings. Four of the nine included studies reported prediction model performance, with a pooled cross-validated or internal test area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.90) across three distinct study populations and a relatively small sample size between 168 and 2,430, with large heterogeneity detected across studies (P < .05, Cochran's Q test; I2 = 98.7%). The authors also explored the feasibility of leveraging four national databases to support future model development and validation efforts aimed at improving LCS adherence.
Conclusions:
Machine learning models that can predict the individual risk for LCS nonadherence are underdeveloped. Radiologists and other stakeholders should invest in the curation of large, multicenter, national databases to facilitate the development and validation of models that identify patients who are in the greatest need of tailored interventions to improve adherence and enhance patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
08:14MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
Published on: October 26, 2017
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...