Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

09:37
Invasive Hemodynamic Characterization of the Portal-hypertensive Syndrome in Cirrhotic Rats
Published on: August 1, 2018
15.4K
Intraoperative Diagnostic Methods for Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
Alexandra A Brandtzäg1, Jonas P Eiberg1,2,3, Mikkel Taudorf2,4
1Department of Vascular Surgery, The Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|December 11, 2025
Summary
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may miss residual stenosis in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenting for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intra-arterial pressure measurement (IAPM) offer better intraoperative assessment for improved outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Radiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is often caused by superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis.
- Endovascular therapy (EVT) is an effective treatment for CMI.
- Accurate intraoperative assessment is vital for successful SMA stenting and long-term patency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate intra-arterial pressure measurement (IAPM) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for detecting residual stenosis during SMA stenting in CMI patients.
- To compare the efficacy of IAPM and CBCT against digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in assessing residual stenosis.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 50 consecutive patients with symptomatic SMA stenosis undergoing elective EVT.
- Intraoperative assessment using DSA, IAPM, and CBCT after stent placement.
- Technical success defined by <30% residual stenosis on DSA, <10 mmHg gradient with IAPM, and full stent expansion on CBCT.
Main Results:
- DSA showed fair agreement with CBCT (Kappa=0.294) but tended to under-detect residual stenosis compared to CBCT (OR=0.176).
- DSA significantly differed from IAPM (Kappa=0.016), suggesting under-detection of residual stenosis (>10 mmHg).
- CBCT and IAPM showed comparable results (Kappa=0.201), indicating similar detection of residual stenosis.
Conclusions:
- Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may overlook significant residual stenosis after SMA stenting.
- Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides valuable structural assessment of stents.
- IAPM and CBCT are more sensitive than DSA for detecting residual stenosis, aiding on-table procedural optimization.

