Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

07:08
Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
Published on: August 1, 2018
8.6K
Stable and variable affordances in object processing: Insights from a mouse-tracking study
1Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|December 11, 2025
Summary
Object processing involves both sensorimotor and semantic systems. Stable object affordances depend on long-term memory, while variable affordances use immediate sensory cues, highlighting conceptual-motor interactions.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Object processing relies on integrating sensory information with existing knowledge.
- The interplay between conceptual knowledge and motor control in object recognition is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of sensorimotor and semantic systems on object processing.
- To examine how different grip types (power vs. precision) affect object affordance perception.
- To differentiate the roles of stable versus variable affordances in object recognition.
Main Methods:
- Participants selected tool and nontool images using large (power grip) or small (precision grip) mice.
- Objects were presented upright (stable affordances) or rotated (variable affordances).
- Response times and mouse movement trajectories (temporal and spatial) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- A compatibility effect was observed when object motion representation matched the mouse response.
- Nontools with tool-like properties activated affordances.
- Stable affordances were linked to long-term memory, while variable affordances depended on online sensory cues.
Conclusions:
- Object processing integrates conceptual and motor systems.
- Stable affordances are based on established object knowledge, whereas variable affordances are dynamically updated.
- Understanding affordances requires considering both semantic knowledge and sensorimotor feedback.

