Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Instrumental variable approach to estimating individual causal effects in N-of-1 trials: application to ISTOP study
Kexin Qu1, Christopher H Schmid2, Tao Liu1
1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI 02903, United States.
Abstract:
An N-of-1 trial is a multiple crossover trial conducted in a single individual to provide evidence to directly inform personalized treatment decisions. Advances in wearable devices greatly improved the feasibility of adopting these trials to identify optimal individual treatment plans, particularly when treatments differ among individuals and responses are highly heterogeneous. Our work was motivated by the I-STOP-AFib Study, which examined the impact of different triggers on atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence. We described a causal framework for "N-of-1" trial using potential treatment selection paths and potential outcome paths. Two estimands of individual causal effect were defined: (i) the effect of continuous exposure, and (ii) the effect of an individual's observed behavior. We addressed three challenges: (i) imperfect compliance to the randomized treatment assignment; (ii) binary treatments and binary outcomes, which led to the "non-collapsibility" issue of estimating odds ratios; and (iii) serial correlation in the longitudinal observations. We adopted the Bayesian IV approach where the study randomization was the instrumental variable (IV) as it impacted the patient's choice of exposure but not directly the outcome. Estimations were obtained through a system of two parametric Bayesian models to estimate the individual causal effect. Our model got around the non-collapsibility and non-consistency by modeling the confounding mechanism through latent structural models and by inferring with Bayesian posterior of functionals. Autocorrelation present in the repeated measurements was also accounted for. The simulation study showed our method largely reduced bias and greatly improved the coverage of the estimated causal effect, compared to existing methods (ITT, PP, and AT). We applied the method to I-STOP-AFib Study to estimate the individual effect of alcohol on AF occurrence.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
What is an Experiment?
Blinding
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...