Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

842
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
842
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.6K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.6K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

255.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
255.2K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

1.5K
Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
1.5K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

376
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
376

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of Plasma Neurexin-3 with Severity of Schizophrenia.

Annals of neurosciences·2026
Same author

India's NCRB Suicide Report 2023: Implications for Implementation of National Suicide Prevention Strategy.

The International journal of social psychiatry·2026
Same author

mHealth Interventions for Attempted Suicide: A Qualitative Exploration of User Attitudes, Barriers, Facilitators, and Preferences.

Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research·2026
Same author

Reply to the Comments on "Meta-analysis Framework as a Form of Original Research".

Indian journal of psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Smartphone app-based Integrated Cognitive Control Training for Anxiety Disorders: Study protocol for a Multi-site Randomized Control Trial.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Eating disorders and disordered eating behaviour in older adults: a scoping review.

Journal of eating disorders·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K

Meta-analysis Framework as a Form of Original Research.

Vikas Menon1, Chittaranjan Andrade2,3

  • 1Dept. of Psychiatry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.

Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
|December 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMAs) are a specialized form of original research. They should be recognized as such for academic advancement and awards.

Keywords:
Meta-AnalysisOriginal ArticleOriginal ResearchPrimary ResearchSystematic Reviews

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence synthesis

Background:

  • Systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMAs) are increasingly prevalent in scientific literature.
  • The academic recognition of SRMAs often lags behind their scientific importance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for the reclassification of systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMAs) as original research.
  • To highlight the scholarly value and rigorous methodology inherent in SRMAs.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the characteristics of systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
  • Comparison of SRMAs with traditional forms of original research.

Main Results:

  • SRMAs share key attributes with original research, including hypothesis testing and data synthesis.
  • The rigorous and systematic approach of SRMAs warrants their classification as original research.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMAs) should be formally recognized as a distinct category of original research.
  • This reclassification is crucial for fair academic evaluation, including journal listings, appointments, promotions, and awards.