Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for Cancer Pain Relief: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Karolina L Bryl1, Adam W Hanley2, Raymond E Baser3
1Integrative Medicine and Wellness Service (K.L.B., K.D., M.D., Q.L., B.S., J.J.M.), Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Context:
Chronic pain affects many cancer survivors yet remains underdiagnosed and inadequately managed. Existing treatments (e.g., opioids, NSAIDs) carry risks like addiction and limited long-term relief, while non-pharmacological options show modest effectiveness. Given these limitations innovative, evidence-based interventions are needed. Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE), a multimodal intervention targeting neurocognitive mechanisms underlying chronic pain, has demonstrated effectiveness in noncancer populations but has not been studied in cancer survivors.
Objective:
This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and explored preliminary efficacy of MORE on pain interference and severity in cancer survivors.
Methods:
Sixty patients with history of any type of cancer living with no evidence of disease or stable oncological disease with moderate-to-severe pain (mean age 60.3 ± 11.8 years; 75% female) were randomized 3:1 to one of three MORE formats (16-hour, 8-hour, or 2-hour) or waitlist control (WLC). Feasibility was assessed through enrollment, assessment completion, and adverse events rates. Acceptability was evaluated by treatment adherence, at-home practice, and satisfaction (Net Promoter Score). Pain interference and pain severity were measured with the Brief Pain Inventory at baseline and weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. Descriptive statistics summarized feasibility and acceptability; constrained linear mixed models tested efficacy and dose-response effects.
Results:
MORE demonstrated feasibility with high enrollment (70.6%) and assessment completion (91%) rates. Treatment adherence was high (16-hour: 64.3%; 8-hour: 81.3%; 2-hour: 100%), with satisfaction highest in the 16-hour format. Within-group reductions in pain interference (-1.22 vs. -0.81) and severity (-1.31 vs. -0.85) favored MORE over WLC, though not significant. A dose-response effect was observed, with all MORE formats yielding significant reductions in pain interference and severity.
Conclusions:
These findings support the feasibility and acceptability of MORE for cancer survivors and suggest potential efficacy in reducing chronic pain among cancer survivors.
Trial Registry/Number:
ClinicalTrials.gov/ NCT05877521.
More Related Videos
07:14A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
05:06Author Spotlight: Integrating Tai Chi with Mindfulness Training to Achieve an Effective Mind-Body Exercise
Published on: July 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Analgesia and Pain Management