Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Feasibility and safety of a modified volume-based feeding protocol in critically ill children: A pilot study
María José Solana García1,2,3,4, Jorge López González1,3,4, Gema Manrique Martín1,3,4
1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Insights
A modified volume-based feeding practice (MVBFP) is feasible and safe for critically ill children, ensuring adequate nutrition despite enteral nutrition interruptions. This approach improves caloric and protein delivery without adverse effects.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care
- Clinical nutrition
- Medical interventions
Background:
- Enteral nutrition interruptions (ENIs) are frequent in critically ill children, often leading to underfeeding.
- Volume-based feeding practices (VBFPs) can mitigate ENIs but lack reporting in pediatric critical care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and safety of a modified VBFP (MVBFP) in critically ill children.
- To evaluate if compensatory feeding over 24 hours can manage ENIs effectively.
Main Methods:
- A prospective longitudinal study involving critically ill children (1 month-18 years) receiving enteral nutrition.
- Implementation of MVBFP with compensatory increased enteral feeding goal rates (CIEFGR) to replace lost volume within 24 hours.
- Data collection included demographics, ENI details, compensatory feeding parameters, intake, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Twenty-eight CIEFGR events occurred in 21 children, with a median compensatory period of 24 hours.
- Significant increases in caloric (18.8 kcal/kg) and protein (0.5 g/kg) delivery were achieved.
- Mild gastrointestinal signs occurred in 10.7% of episodes, requiring no intervention; no significant metabolic alterations were observed.
Conclusions:
- A modified VBFP using compensatory feeding is a feasible and safe strategy for critically ill children.
- This approach effectively improves caloric and protein delivery, mitigating underfeeding risks from ENIs.
- The MVBFP strategy does not appear to increase gastrointestinal side effects in this population.
Objectives:
Enteral nutrition interruptions (ENIs) are common in critically ill children and may cause underfeeding. Volume-based feeding practices (VBFPs) mitigate ENIs, but their use has not been reported in pediatric critical care. We analyzed whether a modified VBFP (MVBFP), based on compensatory feeding over the subsequent 24 h, is feasible and safe.
Methods:
Prospective longitudinal study of critically ill children aged 1 month-18 years receiving enteral nutrition in whom an MVBFP was applied. Compensatory increased enteral feeding goal rates (CIEFGR) were defined as instances in which the volume lost due to an ENI was replaced gradually over the subsequent 24 h by increasing the infusion rate. Data included demographics, ENI characteristics, volume and rate during compensatory feeding, caloric and protein intake, and gastrointestinal or metabolic adverse effects. We also recorded pre-existing gastrointestinal conditions and formula type.
Results:
Twenty-eight CIEFGR were recorded in 21 children. The median compensatory period was 24 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 17.5-24), with a median additional volume of 20 mL/kg (IQR: 10.5-33.1), corresponding to increases of 18.8 kcal/kg (IQR: 9.8-27.8) and 0.5 g/kg protein (IQR: 0.23-0.8). The infusion rate rose from 21 to 27 mL/h (IQR: 20-33). Gastrointestinal signs (increased gastric residual volume, abdominal distension, nausea) occurred in 10.7% of episodes, were mild, and required no intervention. No significant metabolic alterations were observed.
Conclusions:
An MVBFP using compensatory feeding in critically ill children appears feasible and safe, improving caloric and protein delivery without increasing gastrointestinal side effects.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations
The drug's presence in the body is defined by an equation representing the difference between the rates of drug entry and exit. Key parameters—elimination rate constant,...
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance
In the one-compartment open model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, clearance is estimated by dividing the elimination rate by the plasma drug concentration. This equation leverages the elimination rate constant and the apparent...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Bolus Administration
The disparity between drug input and the sum of drug transfer rates between...

