Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
Published on: December 19, 2016
Could the use of a digital caliper device in reading skin prick tests be more sensitive and more reliable than the
Mehmet Özkaya1, Zehra Bayazıt2, Burcu Özge Erdoğan2
1Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye. dr.mehmetozk@gmail.com.
Background:
The global rise in allergic diseases has made accurate identification of atopy increasingly important. The skin prick test is the most common diagnostic tool, and both its correct performance and standardized interpretation are essential for reliability. Reliability, defined as the consistency of measurements across different observers and instruments, was evaluated by comparing ruler- and caliper-based wheal measurements. This study aimed to assess the consistency and reliability of skin prick test measurements performed with two different instruments and by two different nurses in a pediatric allergy clinic.
Methods:
This prospective study included 100 children aged 6-18 years at Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine. For each participant, skin prick test wheal diameters were measured using both a standard ruler and a digital caliper, each by two different nurses. Measurement times were recorded by an independent observer using a stopwatch. Consistency between observers and instruments was evaluated by comparing ruler- and caliper-based results.
Results:
Measurements obtained with the digital caliper showed stronger agreement between the two nurses than those taken with the ruler. The mean inter-observer difference for caliper-based measurements was 0.03 mm (p > 0.05), whereas ruler-based measurements differed by 0.22 mm between the two nurses (p < 0.05), indicating reduced inter-observer variability. The digital caliper provided more precise, consistent, and reliable readings of wheal size, underscoring its advantage in standardized test evaluation.
Conclusion:
Measurement techniques and instrument types significantly affect the accuracy and sensitivity of skin prick test interpretation. Despite being a reliable method for confirming IgE-mediated sensitization, manual reading introduces variability. Using a digital caliper minimizes potential errors and enhances the precision and reproducibility of results, contributing to more standardized and reliable allergy testing practices.
More Related Videos
07:49Measuring Changes in Tactile Sensitivity in the Hind Paw of Mice Using an Electronic von Frey Apparatus
Published on: December 19, 2013
08:50Fabrication and Characterization of a Conformal Skin-like Electronic System for Quantitative, Cutaneous Wound Management
Published on: September 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Body Temperature - Axilla
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and put on clean gloves to maintain infection control and prevent cross-contamination.
Step 2: Prepare the patient by explaining the procedure to ensure understanding and cooperation. Ensure privacy, expose the axilla, and inform the patient that minimal movement is crucial for an accurate reading.
Step 3: Adjust the patient’s clothing to expose only the axilla. It minimizes...
Temperature Measurement Sites
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments