Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Ensuring coherence in occupational biomonitoring: a call for alignment and collaboration
Nancy B Hopf1, Susana Viegas2, Maryam Zare Jeddi3
1Unisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health & University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Certified occupational hygienists are excluded from biomonitoring for exposure assessments, hindering worker safety. Reconsidering EU guidance can integrate these professionals for better workplace health protection.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Environmental Health
- Toxicology
Background:
- Biomonitoring is crucial for assessing worker exposure to hazardous substances.
- Current European Union (EU) regulations, including recent EU-OSHA 2025 guidance, inadequately frame biomonitoring within medical surveillance.
- This framing limits biomonitoring's preventive potential and excludes key professionals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the exclusion of certified occupational hygienists from biomonitoring-based exposure assessments.
- To advocate for a revised regulatory approach that integrates occupational hygienists into biomonitoring protocols.
- To encourage collaboration between occupational hygienists and occupational medical doctors for enhanced worker health protection.
Main Methods:
- This is a commentary, not an empirical study.
- Analysis of current EU regulations and EU-OSHA guidance concerning biomonitoring.
- Expert opinion from a multidisciplinary team of occupational hygienists and occupational medical doctors.
Main Results:
- The current EU regulatory framework, particularly the EU-OSHA 2025 guidance, excludes certified occupational hygienists from conducting exposure assessments via biomonitoring.
- This exclusion represents a missed opportunity for interdisciplinary collaboration.
- The existing structure limits the effective use of biomonitoring as a preventive occupational health tool.
Conclusions:
- Biomonitoring is underutilized as a preventive tool due to regulatory limitations.
- A more integrated approach involving occupational hygienists and occupational medical doctors is necessary.
- Revising EU guidance can optimize biomonitoring for comprehensive worker health protection.
More Related Videos
08:14Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
Published on: April 28, 2023
06:32Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring
Published on: July 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...