Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
Ordering Practices and Utilization of a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Tyler Cooke1, Craig R Soderquist1, Mahesh M Mansukhani1
1Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) panel orders are generally appropriate. Current ordering practices and diagnostic codes do not require additional clinical decision support interventions for improved laboratory stewardship.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Oncology
Background:
- Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are diagnosed using molecular testing for JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations.
- High reimbursement denial rates prompted a review of MPN panel ordering practices and test utilization.
- The goal was to identify optimization, education, or triage strategies to enhance laboratory stewardship.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the appropriateness of MPN panel test orders.
- To assess the utility of clinical decision support tools, such as CBC values and ICD10 codes, in optimizing test utilization.
- To understand factors contributing to reimbursement denials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of MPN panel orders from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023.
- Data included ordering provider, complete blood count (CBC) values, demographics, test results, and ICD10 codes.
- Manual review of orders by laboratory staff defined clinical appropriateness based on unexplained cytosis or thrombosis.
Main Results:
- 257 unique patient orders were analyzed; 79.0% were from hematology/oncology providers.
- 72.8% of orders had cytosis-related ICD10 codes; 11.7% had thrombosis-related codes.
- MPN panel results were negative in 76.3% of patients; 13.2% were positive for JAK2/CALR/MPL mutations. No significant association between ICD10 codes and positive results was found.
Conclusions:
- MPN panel orders at the institution are generally appropriate and correctly placed.
- Additional interventions using CBC values or ICD10 codes are unlikely to significantly benefit test utilization.
- Addressing reimbursement challenges requires continued stakeholder engagement to ensure continued access to diagnostic testing.
More Related Videos
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023