Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Robotic total knee arthroplasty with functional positioning safely addresses major coronal deformities: Comparable
Luca Andriollo1,2,3, Emanuele Diquattro1,4, Christos Koutserimpas1,5,6
1Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon France.
Purpose:
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has emerged as a reliable strategy to improve surgical accuracy and enable functional alignment (FA), also referred to as functional knee positioning (FKP). However, its application in patients with major coronal plane deformities remains under-investigated. This study aimed to evaluate complication rates, implant survival, radiographic outcomes and patient-reported measures in patients with severe deformities undergoing robotic-assisted TKA with FA/FKP principles compared to matched controls.
Methods:
A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients who underwent robotic-assisted TKA between March 2021 and February 2023 at a single high-volume centre. Patients with ≥15° varus or ≥10° valgus deformity were included in the study group and matched 1:1 with controls presenting neutral alignment. All procedures used the Mako robotic-arm-assisted system with standardised FA/FKP principles. Clinical outcomes included knee society score (KSS), forgotten joint score (FJS-12), Kujala anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) and range of motion. Radiographic measurements and robotic data were assessed. Complications, reoperations and revision rates were analysed.
Results:
Eighty-eight patients (44 per group) were analysed, with a mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 0.9 years. Complication and revision rates were comparable between groups (revision: 2.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.987). Patients with major deformities achieved higher FJS-12 scores (83.9 ± 20.2 vs. 74.9 ± 19.0, p = 0.040), although the difference did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID = 9.9). Postoperative mHKA was less neutral in the deformity group (176.8° ± 4.7 vs. 180.0° ± 3.0, p = 0.002), without adverse impact on implant survival.
Conclusions:
Robotic-assisted TKA performed with FA/FKP principles appears to be a feasible option for patients with severe varus or valgus deformities. Despite residual alignment variability, complication and revision rates remained comparable to standard cases, and patient-reported outcomes suggested greater perceived functional improvement.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
