Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Dichotic Listening: Investigating Selective Auditory Attention

Dichotic Listening: Investigating Selective Auditory Attention

Published on: April 30, 2023

Don't Listen to Yourself!

Stefanie Christina Richthofer¹, Franca Grafe¹, Jan Philipp Röer¹

¹Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Experimental Psychology

|January 19, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Dichotic Listening

Dichotic Listening

Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

A test battery (IMAP) for performing an in-depth assessment of auditory and cognitive abilities contributing to listening skills is described. It is quick to administer, child-friendly and free from linguistic confounds. Stimulus generation and protocol management are controlled via a software platform (IHR-STAR) to ensure replicable...

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

The history of therapeutic communication can be traced back to Florence Nightingale, who emphasized the importance of developing trusting relationships with patients. She taught that the presence of nurses with patients results in therapeutic healing.
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...

Electroencephalography Measurements in Awake Marmosets Listening to Conspecific Vocalizations

Electroencephalography Measurements in Awake Marmosets Listening to Conspecific Vocalizations

To study the evolution of language, comparing brain mechanisms in humans with those in nonhuman primates is important. We developed a method to noninvasively measure the electroencephalography (EEG) of awake animals. It allows us to directly compare EEG data between humans and animals for the long term without harming...

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Here, we present a protocol to assess driving behaviors while following a vehicle in a simulated driving environment. The presented protocol is used to compare the impact of different auditory backgrounds on driving...

Assessing the Effects of Music Listening on Psychobiological Stress in Daily Life

Assessing the Effects of Music Listening on Psychobiological Stress in Daily Life

A study protocol is presented on how to assess associations between music listening and psychobiological stress (as measured by subjective stress levels, salivary cortisol, and salivary alpha-amylase) in daily life. Advice on study design, materials, methods, selection of participants, and statistical handling is provided. Representative results are presented and discussed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026

Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026

Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Same author

The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.

Journal of open psychology data·2025

Same author

Cross-cultural data on romantic love and mate preferences from 117,293 participants across 175 countries.

Scientific data·2025

Same author

Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset.

Scientific data·2025

Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026

Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026

Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026

Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026

Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026

Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026

See all related articles

Your own voice does not automatically grab attention. This study found that self-relevant stimuli only capture attention when the cognitive system deems them behaviorally relevant.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Auditory Perception
Self-Referential Processing

Background:

The human voice is a highly familiar and self-relevant stimulus.
Self-relevant stimuli, like one's own name, often capture attention, but the underlying mechanism (self-relevance vs. behavioral relevance) is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if a self-relevant stimulus (own voice) without a strong call to action captures attention.
To compare the disruptive effect of one's own voice versus another person's voice on cognitive performance.

Main Methods:

A conceptual replication study using a classic serial recall paradigm.
Three auditory conditions: quiet control, own artificially generated voice, and another person's voice (yoked control).

Keywords:

auditory distraction own voice selective attention self-reference working memory

More Related Videos

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Author Spotlight: Investigating Vocal Information Representation in Small Primates and Its Alteration by Psychiatric Disorders Using Noninvasive EEG

Author Spotlight: Investigating Vocal Information Representation in Small Primates and Its Alteration by Psychiatric Disorders Using Noninvasive EEG

Published on: July 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Dichotic Listening: Investigating Selective Auditory Attention

Dichotic Listening: Investigating Selective Auditory Attention

Published on: April 30, 2023

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Author Spotlight: Investigating Vocal Information Representation in Small Primates and Its Alteration by Psychiatric Disorders Using Noninvasive EEG

Author Spotlight: Investigating Vocal Information Representation in Small Primates and Its Alteration by Psychiatric Disorders Using Noninvasive EEG

Published on: July 26, 2024

Main Results:

No significant difference in recall performance was found between the own voice and other voice conditions.
This suggests that not all self-relevant stimuli inherently capture attention.

Conclusions:

Attention capture by self-relevant stimuli may depend on the cognitive system's assessment of behavioral relevance.
The findings challenge the notion that all self-relevant auditory stimuli automatically command attention.