Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Value01:15

Expected Value

7.4K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
7.4K
Coordination Number and Geometry02:57

Coordination Number and Geometry

19.0K
For transition metal complexes, the coordination number determines the geometry around the central metal ion. Table 1 compares coordination numbers to molecular geometry. The most common structures of the complexes in coordination compounds are octahedral, tetrahedral, and square planar.
19.0K
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature02:54

Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature

26.4K
In most main group element compounds, the valence electrons of the isolated atoms combine to form chemical bonds that satisfy the octet rule. For instance, the four valence electrons of carbon overlap with electrons from four hydrogen atoms to form CH4. The one valence electron leaves sodium and adds to the seven valence electrons of chlorine to form the ionic formula unit NaCl (Figure 1a). Transition metals do not normally bond in this fashion. They primarily form coordinate covalent bonds, a...
26.4K
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number02:33

Lattice Centering and Coordination Number

11.4K
The structure of a crystalline solid, whether a metal or not, is best described by considering its simplest repeating unit, which is referred to as its unit cell. The unit cell consists of lattice points that represent the locations of atoms or ions. The entire structure then consists of this unit cell repeating in three dimensions. The three different types of unit cells present in the cubic lattice are illustrated in Figure 1.
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
11.4K
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy01:24

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

392
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
392
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

14.5K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
14.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure-Guided Prioritization and Synthesis of New Ligands for GPR17 Receptor.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Definition and Test-Retest Reliability of a Monitoring Method Integrating Accelerometric Actigraphy and Bluetooth Indoor Location Tracking Applied in a Long-Term Residential Unit for Persons With Dementia: Longitudinal Observational Study.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2026
Same author

MEP-independent silent periods in hand muscles elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the ventral premotor cortex: a non-invasive tool to explore premotor negative motor areas.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

Mechanical stability of the interaction between a lower-limb rehabilitation exoskeleton and the user's body during functional tasks.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Early Target Object Prediction in Action Observation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Agilik@home: A randomized controlled trial protocol to evaluate the effects of home-based training with the Agilik powered KAFO in children with cerebral palsy and crouch gait.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing
14:13

Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing

Published on: May 6, 2014

18.7K

Rational expectations and kinematic information in coordination games.

Martina Fanghella1, Camilla F Colombo2, Fabio Aurelio D'Asaro3

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy; Cognition in Action (CIA) Unit, PHILAB, 20122 Milano, Italy.

Cognition
|January 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans prioritize real-time movement cues over abstract payoff assumptions for successful coordination. Early kinematic signals about partners' actions significantly influence strategic choices, improving coordination success.

Keywords:
Game theoryReach-to-grasp kinematicsStrategic reasoningTarget prediction

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.5K
Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing
14:13

Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing

Published on: May 6, 2014

18.7K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.5K
Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Strategic coordination relies on integrating abstract reasoning with real-time action observation.
  • Understanding how humans resolve conflicts between these information sources is crucial for explaining coordinated behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals coordinate in a strategic game using partial kinematic information from a partner's actions.
  • To examine the conflict resolution between strategic expectations and observed movement cues.

Main Methods:

  • Participants played a HI-LO game against a virtual partner, observing partial kinematic cues (10-40% movement) of grasping actions.
  • Kinematic information was derived from schematic animations of hand movements, focusing on maximum grip aperture changes.
  • Participants' choices were analyzed based on their reliance on kinematic cues versus game-theoretic expectations.

Main Results:

  • Participants predominantly favored higher payoffs, aligning with game-theoretic predictions.
  • Observed partial kinematic cues significantly altered participants' choices, overriding initial payoff-based expectations.
  • Early kinematic signals indicating a partner's intention toward a lower-payoff target led participants to revise their preference, enhancing coordination.

Conclusions:

  • Human strategic coordination prioritizes perceptual evidence of actions over abstract assumptions of rational payoff maximization.
  • Even minimal, early kinematic cues are powerful in shifting beliefs about an agent's intentions.
  • Action perception plays a central role in successful strategic coordination and belief updating.