In-Person and Virtual Interview Format for General Surgery Residency From an Applicant Perspective.

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Surgical Residency Training
• Applicant Selection Processes

Background:

• The COVID-19 pandemic shifted residency interviews to virtual formats (VTIs), with a gradual reintroduction of in-person interviews (IPIs).
• Applicant perceptions of VTI versus IPI formats are crucial for optimizing residency recruitment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare applicant perceptions of virtual interviews (VTIs) versus in-person interviews (IPIs) for a general surgery residency program.
• To identify key factors influencing applicant interview format preference and program ranking.

Main Methods:

• Survey administered to general surgery residency applicants regarding interview format experiences.
• Evaluation of factors important for program ranking, interview platform satisfaction, and decision-making.
• Primary outcome: comparison of applicant perspectives on VTI versus IPI.

Main Results:

• No statistically significant differences in applicants' ability to rank programs based on VTI versus IPI.
• Applicants reported higher satisfaction with in-person pre-interview social events and hospital tours during IPIs.
• Financial considerations and accessibility significantly influenced virtual interview format selection for many applicants.

Conclusions:

• Both virtual interviews (VTIs) and in-person interviews (IPIs) are viable formats for residency selection.
• While IPIs enhance specific aspects of the applicant experience, VTI accessibility is a key factor for many applicants.
• Residency programs should consider offering both interview formats to accommodate diverse applicant needs and preferences.