Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
Published on: June 12, 2016
Evaluation and development of prediction models for enteric methane emissions from cattle in India
S Alam1, E Schlecht2, C A Bateki2
1Animal Husbandry in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Kassel and Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany; Department of Dairy and Poultry Science, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh.
Abstract:
India is home to more than 525 million ruminants, which are major contributors to global warming via enteric methane (EntCH4) emissions. Various mitigation strategies exist to reduce EntCH4 emissions but accurate emission estimates are needed to establish the true potential of these strategies. Measuring EntCH4 emissions is expensive and unrealistic at such a large scale, so an urgent need exists for accurate EntCH4 prediction models. The present study evaluated the accuracy of various existing models and developed a new model to predict EntCH4 emissions from cattle in India. Six EntCH4 prediction models based on either DMI or gross energy intake (GEI) were identified as applicable to and suitable for the Indian context. Models based on DMI and GEI were derived from various works, including those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others (designated as IPCCDMI, IPCCGEI, RibeiroDMI, RibeiroGEI, PatraDMI, and PatraGEI). These were evaluated using 2 independent datasets characterizing 528 lactating (dairy) and 122 nonlactating (nondairy) cattle from 15 and 13 studies, respectively, under different management practices across 13 Indian states. Furthermore, the same datasets were combined to develop an empirical EntCH4 prediction model using a linear mixed-effects framework. The relative prediction error (RPE) and mean bias error (MBE) were used to evaluate model accuracy. A model's prediction was considered acceptable when RPE was <20%. None of the 6 models predicted EntCH4 for nondairy cattle with an RPE <20%. None of the 6 models predicted EntCH4 for both dairy and nondairy cattle with an RPE <20%. For dairy cattle, only the RibeiroDMI and PatraDMI models approached this threshold, producing RPE values of 22.6% and 22.9%, respectively. The linear mixed-effects model (Alam's model, described herein: EntCH4 [g/d per head] = 15.45 + 1.91 × DMI [kg/d], conditional R2 = 0.94), developed for both dairy and nondairy cattle, achieved a substantially lower RPE (9.48%) than any of the 6 previously tested models. Whereas the RibeiroDMI and PatraDMI models could acceptably predict EntCH4 emissions from dairy cattle in India, none of the evaluated models were suitable for nondairy cattle. Our linear mixed-effects model provides more accuracy than the latter 2 in estimating emissions for dairy cattle and also offers a suitable option for nondairy cattle in India.
Related Concept Videos
Emission Spectra
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Routes of Drug Administration: Enteral
Enteral administration involves drug administration via the mouth in two ways: orally or sublingually.
Unlike sublingually drugs, drugs that are taken orally pass through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and get metabolized by the liver. Once metabolized, the drug is absorbed into the systemic circulation, reaching different body parts via the bloodstream. However, while passing through the stomach,...

