Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
Published on: February 6, 2020
Automated Classification of Humpback Whale Calls Using Deep Learning: A Comparative Study of Neural Architectures and
1School of Electrical Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences (EECMS), Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
Abstract:
Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) using hydrophones enables collecting acoustic data to be collected in large and diverse quantities, necessitating the need for a reliable automated classification system. This paper presents a data-processing pipeline and a set of neural networks designed for a humpback-whale-detection system. A collection of audio segments is compiled using publicly available audio repositories and extensively curated via manual methods, undertaking thorough examination, editing and clipping to produce a dataset minimizing bias or categorization errors. An array of standard data-augmentation techniques are applied to the collected audio, diversifying and expanding the original dataset. Multiple neural networks are designed and trained using TensorFlow 2.20.0 and Keras 3.13.1 frameworks, resulting in a custom curated architecture layout based on research and iterative improvements. The pre-trained model MobileNetV2 is also included for further analysis. Model performance demonstrates a strong dependence on both feature representation and network architecture. Mel spectrogram inputs consistently outperformed MFCC (Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients) features across all model types. The highest performance was achieved by the pretrained MobileNetV2 using mel spectrograms without augmentation, reaching a test accuracy of 99.01% with balanced precision and recall of 99% and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.98. The custom CNN with mel spectrograms also achieved strong performance, with 98.92% accuracy and a false negative rate of only 0.75%. In contrast, models trained with MFCC representations exhibited consistently lower robustness and higher false negative rates. These results highlight the comparative strengths of the evaluated feature representations and network architectures for humpback whale detection.
More Related Videos
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
08:06Automated Acoustic Dispensing for the Serial Dilution of Peptide Agonists in Potency Determination Assays
Published on: November 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Polymer Classification: Architecture
State Space Representation
Consider an RLC circuit, a...
Control Volume and System Representations
The control volume approach considers a stationary region in space through which fluid flows. This region is bounded by a control surface. For instance, in the case of water...
Graphical Representation of Inequalities
Vector Representation of Complex Numbers
Consider a function defined as the product of the complex factors in the numerator divided by the product of the complex factors in the...
Graphical and Analytic Representation of Sinusoids
The first step is measuring the peak-to-peak value, which is twice the amplitude of the sinusoid. This provides information about the maximum voltage swing of the waveform.
Secondly, the period and angular frequency are determined. The period is the time taken for one complete cycle of the waveform, while...