Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Chemical Synthesis of Porous Barium Titanate Thin Film and Thermal Stabilization of Ferroelectric Phase by Porosity-Induced Strain
Published on: March 27, 2018
Defect-engineered ferroelectricity and magnetoelectric coupling in LaFeO3 thin films
Fengbo Yan1, Vladislav Korostelev2, Houlin Zhou3
1Center for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China. xiaolei.sun@nankai.edu.cn.
Abstract:
The pursuit of single-phase multiferroics that operate at room temperature remains a significant challenge due to the mutual exclusiveness of ferroelectricity and magnetism in most materials. LaFeO3 (LFO), a classic antiferromagnet, is non-ferroelectric in its bulk form. Herein, we demonstrate the creation of room-temperature ferroelectricity in epitaxial LFO thin films via a defect-engineering strategy. By modulating the oxygen partial pressure during growth, we deliberately introduce cationic off-stoichiometry, leading to the formation of LaFe and FeLa antisite defects. A combination of scanning transmission electron microscopy, positive-up-negative-down measurements, and density functional theory calculations confirms that these antisite defects are the microscopic origin of a polar R3c phase, which gives rise to intrinsic switchable ferroelectricity. Furthermore, piezoresponse force microscopy under applied magnetic fields reveals a noticeable magnetoelectric coupling. This work not only unveils a novel mechanism for activating multiferroicity in LFO but also establishes cationic antisite engineering as a general paradigm for designing multifunctional properties in the rare earth orthoferrite family.
Related Concept Videos
Lumber Defects
Shakes are minor fractures that run along or across the wood's annual rings, while wane is...
What is Genetic Engineering?
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

