Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
Published on: October 14, 2022
No Difference in Lumbar Pelvic Angle Postoperative Changes Between Single-Level L5-S1 ALIF and TLIF Patients
Michelle Nakatsuka1, Remi Pelletier-Roy2, Akil Paturi2
1NYU Grossman School of Medicine.
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) offers better regional and segmental lordosis restoration than transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for single-level L5-S1 fusions. However, neither approach significantly impacts global spinopelvic alignment.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedics
- Radiographic analysis
Background:
- Restoring sagittal alignment is crucial in lumbar fusion surgery.
- Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is often considered superior for segmental lordosis compared to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
- The comparative effects of ALIF versus TLIF on global and regional lumbar alignment, as well as spinopelvic parameters, require further quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of single-level L5-S1 ALIF and TLIF on various sagittal alignment parameters.
- To quantify changes in lumbar pelvic angle (LPA), pelvic tilt (PT), and lumbar lordosis (L1-S1, L4-S1, L5-S1) after ALIF versus TLIF.
- To evaluate the differential effects of ALIF and TLIF on spinopelvic parameters and regional/segmental lordosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 174 patients undergoing single-level L5-S1 ALIF (n=73) or TLIF (n=101).
- Preoperative and one-year postoperative radiographic assessment of sagittal alignment parameters using Surgimap software.
- Statistical analysis included unpaired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and ANCOVA for comparisons and sensitivity analyses.
Main Results:
- ALIF demonstrated significantly greater improvement in regional (L4-S1) and segmental (L5-S1) lumbar lordosis compared to TLIF.
- No significant differences were found between ALIF and TLIF in postoperative changes for global lumbar lordosis (L1-S1), lumbar pelvic angle (LPA), or pelvic tilt (PT).
- Permutation testing confirmed no statistically significant difference in LPA improvement between the two surgical techniques.
Conclusions:
- Single-level ALIF is more effective than TLIF in restoring regional and segmental lumbar lordosis at the L5-S1 level.
- Neither ALIF nor TLIF significantly alters global sagittal alignment (L1-S1 lordosis, LPA, PT) following single-level fusion.
- This study highlights the limited influence of single-level L5-S1 fusion on overall spinopelvic parameters, with ALIF showing advantages in segmental correction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Contact Angle
The adhesive force is the molecular force between molecules of different materials, that is, between the molecules of the solid and the liquid. The cohesive...
Muscles of the Pelvic Floor and Perineum
Perineal Layer
The perineum is a diamond-shaped area below the pelvic diaphragm, divided into an anterior urogenital triangle that contains the external genitals and a posterior anal triangle housing the anus. The urogenital...
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

