Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Be a buddy: implementation and trainee perspectives on a near-peer mentorship program
Spandana Induru1,2, Brandon Ho3, Lauren Ameden4
1Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Introduction:
Evidence for mentorship largely focuses on traditional faculty-resident mentorship, with limited assessment of fellows as near-peer mentors. Our intervention develops and assesses a resident-fellow mentorship initiative.
Methods:
We conducted a sequential, adaptive multi-method design program evaluation. First, to evaluate trainee attitudes and beliefs around fellows as residents' mentors we conducted annual surveys. Subsequently, interviews were used to iteratively understand how fellow-resident mentorship affected trainees' career development experiences in pursuit of fellowships.Our mentorship program at an academic pediatric hospital matched residents with fellows from 2020-2023 based on career subspecialty interests. Participants completed pre-intervention and post-participation surveys assessing experiences with prior mentorship, attitudes towards mentorship, and confidence in fellows as mentors. Subsequently in 2023, participants were recruited for qualitative, structured interviews to gain deeper understanding of experiences and recognize opportunities for program expansion and improvement.
Results:
Seventy-two residents were paired with 53 fellows in dyads and triads of mentorship during the study period. Survey data revealed: 1) Less than half of residents (49%) and fellows (29%) previously had fellow mentorship; 2) Post-participation, 29% of residents and 21% of fellows completed surveys, and all accepted that fellows are capable mentors; 3) Lower satisfaction ratings on surveyed experience coincided with fewer meetings or mismatched specialty of interest.Subsequent interviews with 9 residents (post-match) and 9 fellows revealed: 1) The greatest benefit was strengthening residents' applications and insight into subspecialties; 2) Fellows were perceived as near-peers with deeper understanding and ease in communicating; 3) Barriers of time constraints and mismatch between specialties were underscored; 4) Fellows noted benefits of reflection opportunity and mentorship skill building.
Discussion:
Implementation of a near-peer mentorship program for trainees interested in subspecialty careers provided an added layer of support in this single-center Pediatric training program. Fellows may be an underutilized resource for near-peer mentorship of trainees.
Related Concept Videos
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

