Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

4.7K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From "negative" trial to positive clinical impact: mitigating eligibility criteria-induced temporal selection bias in emulated clinical trials.

npj health systems·2026
Same author

Unraveling the genetic interplay between sleep disorders and Alzheimer's disease: From shared genes to potential therapeutic targets.

Journal of affective disorders·2025
Same author

"Definitely a toaster": Identifying container contents by touch and sound.

Perception·2025
Same author

Lipid-Coated Mesoporous Silica Particles for pH-Sensitive Tumor-Targeted Paclitaxel: Development, Characterization.

Journal of Cancer·2025
Same author

Sensing What You Do Not See: Alerting of Approaching Objects with a Haptic Vest.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Interactive AI annotation of medical images in a virtual reality environment.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2025
Same journal

Pseudo-slimy: A novel phenomenon to evoke stickiness perception.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Predictive visual uncertainty around moving trajectories influences causality judgments in launching displays.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Light and shape in the work of Robert Fones.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Sensorimotor numerosity uniquely supports arithmetic development in children.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

In praise of anaglyphs.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Is number a primary perceptual attribute?

i-Perception·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.9K

When does movement help touch? Interstimulus separation and task difficulty in vibrotactile frequency discrimination.

Mounia Ziat1,2, Jose James1, Junjie Hua1

  • 1Experience Design, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, USA.

I-Perception
|February 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Agency over movement can improve tactile perception, but this effect depends on spatial separation and task difficulty. Self-controlled movement enhanced vibrotactile frequency discrimination, especially at larger distances and with easier tasks.

Keywords:
externally guided movementinterstimulus spatial separationpredictive attenuationself-controlled movementtactile suppressionvibrotactile perception

More Related Videos

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

13.2K
A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.9K
Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

13.2K
A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Self-controlled movement is generally assumed to suppress tactile perception.
  • However, recent findings suggest agency can sometimes enhance sensory performance.
  • The interplay between movement agency, spatial factors, and task demands in tactile perception remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how interstimulus spatial separation and task difficulty modulate the impact of movement agency on vibrotactile frequency discrimination.
  • To challenge existing models of sensory suppression by exploring conditions where agency enhances tactile performance.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed vibrotactile frequency discrimination tasks using a haptic device.
  • Movement was either self-controlled (participant-driven) or externally guided.
  • Interstimulus spatial separation and task difficulty were systematically varied.

Main Results:

  • Discrimination accuracy improved with larger spatial separations between stimuli.
  • Performance was significantly lower at the shortest spatial separation.
  • Self-controlled movement enhanced accuracy in easy and difficult tasks.
  • However, self-controlled movement impaired performance at intermediate difficulty with large separations.

Conclusions:

  • Tactile perception is not simply suppressed by self-controlled movement; agency can enhance performance under specific conditions.
  • Spatial configuration, motor control, and task demands interact to shape tactile decision-making.
  • Findings challenge simplistic sensory suppression models and emphasize a more nuanced understanding of agency in sensory processing.