Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Modeling Evasive Response Bias in Randomized Response: Cheater Detection Versus Self-protective No-Saying
Khadiga H A Sayed1,2, Maarten J L F Cruyff1, Peter G M van der Heijden1,3
1Utrecht University.
This study introduces new models for the "ever/last year" randomized response design to better account for evasive response bias in sensitive surveys. These models improve data accuracy for sensitive topics like doping use.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Statistics
- Survey Methodology
Background:
- Randomized response techniques (RRT) aim to reduce evasive response bias in surveys on sensitive topics.
- Existing models, like the cheater detection and self-protective no sayers models, partially address this bias but have limitations.
- A hybrid
- ever/last year
- design offers potential for improved data collection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and present statistical models for the hybrid
- ever/last year
- RRT design.
- To account for both self-protective no-saying and cheating behaviors within this design.
- To illustrate the application of these models using doping use surveys.
Main Methods:
- The study establishes the correspondence between existing RRT bias models.
- New models are introduced for the
- ever/last year
- design, incorporating parameters for response bias.
- Extensions of the design with additional questions and degrees of freedom are modeled.
Main Results:
- The proposed models for the
- ever/last year
- design allow for the inclusion of response bias parameters.
- Models with multiple degrees of freedom are developed for more complex survey designs.
- The models were successfully illustrated using real-world doping use survey data.
Conclusions:
- The
- ever/last year
- RRT design, with the proposed models, offers a promising approach for sensitive data collection.
- These models enhance the ability to detect and correct for response biases.
- Further research is warranted to explore the full potential of this design and its extensions.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Self-Serving Bias
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Confirmation Biases

