Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

06:38
Establishment of a Segmental Femoral Critical-size Defect Model in Mice Stabilized by Plate Osteosynthesis
Published on: October 12, 2016
10.6K
Patient-Specific Lattice Implants for Segmental Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction (Part 1): Defect Patterns, Fixation
Mansoureh Rezapourian1, Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi2, Mahan Nematollahi3
1Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.
Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 26, 2026
Summary
Patient-specific porous implants made using computed tomography (CT) and additive manufacturing (AM) show promise for reconstructing large bone defects. However, a significant validation gap exists between simulations and clinical outcomes, hindering widespread adoption.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomaterials science
- Medical device engineering
Background:
- Large segmental defects in the femur and tibia present significant reconstruction challenges.
- Computed Tomography (CT)-based, additively manufactured (AM) porous implants offer a patient-specific solution.
- Current approaches utilize lattice implants, architected cages, and modular constructs with engineered porosity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the application of CT-based AM porous implants for femur and tibia reconstruction.
- To analyze how defect characteristics influence fixation and mechanical performance.
- To identify current limitations and future directions for clinical translation.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature review of studies employing CT-based AM porous implants for long bone reconstruction.
- Analysis of defect classification, implant design, fixation strategies, and reported outcomes.
- Evaluation of simulation (Finite Element Analysis) and mechanical testing data.
Main Results:
- Outcomes are strongly influenced by defect morphology and local biology.
- Implant stiffness, micromotion, and fatigue are controlled by lattice architecture, relative density, and fixation.
- A significant gap exists between simulation/bench testing and in vivo validation, with limited reporting of biological endpoints.
Conclusions:
- CT-based AM porous implants show potential for segmental bone defect reconstruction.
- Standardization of defect descriptors, fixation reporting, and outcome metrics is crucial.
- Bridging the validation gap through integrated datasets and harmonized protocols is essential for clinical translation.
Keywords:
3D-printed porous scaffoldsCT-based surgical planningadditive manufacturing in orthopaedicscritical-sized bone defectsfemoral and tibial reconstructionfixation strategieslattice implantsload-bearinglocking plate fixationmechanobiologypatient-specific implantspersonalized bone tissue engineeringporous bone scaffoldsscaffold-guided bone regenerationsegmental femoral and tibial defectssegmental long bone defectsstress shielding
