Comparison and Modeling of Different Drying Technologies for Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim.: Changes in Drying
Jian-Wu Dai1, Qi Zeng1, Ying-Qing Du1
1College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China.
Abstract:
This study systematically evaluated the drying kinetics of Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim. during microwave vacuum drying (MVD), pulsation vacuum drying (PVD) and hot-air drying (HAD) at different temperatures and analyzed the heating mechanism differences in the three technologies via numerical simulation. Drying kinetics indicated that MVD was the most efficient technique owing to its volumetric dielectric heating, whereas the PVD efficiency depended heavily on precise cyclic parameter control. As verified by simulations, a more uniform temperature field was formed in MVD, while PVD achieved focused core heating via infrared radiation. Quality analysis revealed that the dehiscence rate increased significantly with the temperature, and both MVD and PVD demonstrated superior color retention over HAD; however, MVD was the most effective for preserving volatile oils, while PVD excelled in amide preservation. It should be noted that the specific component retention advantages of PVD were balanced by its strict parameter requirements, which limits its potential for large-scale application. Comprehensive evaluation confirmed MVD's superiority in Z. bungeanum drying, effectively retaining thermosensitive components under a vacuum pressure of -90 kPa at 60 °C.
More Related Videos
07:06Methods for the Self-integration of Megamolecular Biopolymers on the Drying Air-LC Interface
Published on: April 7, 2017
09:58Preparation of Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Organisms Using Chemical Drying for Morphological Analysis in Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Drying Shrinkage
A portion of this drying shrinkage can be reversed; if the concrete is...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II
