RNA-Based Biomarkers for Diagnostic Discrimination of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Systematic Review
Jan Emmerich1,2, Aditya Chanpura3, Frank C Barone3
1Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Background: Diagnostic discrimination between ischemic stroke (IS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS) is required for successful intervention with time-critical acute treatments. The available data on blood-based RNA biomarkers and discrimination between IS and HS are limited. This systematic review aimed to examine and summarize the existing literature on potentially useful blood-based RNA biomarkers that may aid in preclinical acute diagnosis. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature on the ability of blood-based RNA biomarkers to discriminate between IS and HS according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and The Web of Science for eligible randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case-control studies published in the English language without time limitation. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: We included eight studies with a total of 728 patients (436 with IS and 292 with HS) in our review. The study quality was good in five and fair in three investigations. No meta-analysis was performed due to high heterogeneity in methods and study endpoints. Reported biomarkers include miRNA-124-3p, miRNA-16, miRNA-340-5p, lncRNA XIST (X-inactive specific transcript), PFKFB3 mRNA (6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase), tRNA derivatives, tRNA fragments, extracellular miRNAs, transcriptome changes, and MCEMP1 gene expression. Assessment techniques varied widely across studies, ranging from RNA sequencing to qPCR, microarray, human transcriptome array, and ELISA. MicroRNA-124-3p, miRNA-340-5p, lncRNA XIST, PFKFB3 mRNA, and MCEMP1 gene expression differed significantly between IS and HS. In one study, principal component analysis and unsupervised learning demonstrated the utility of hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed exons to discriminate between HS and IS. Conclusions: This review demonstrates the utility of single RNA-based targets and clusters that may have diagnostic value in distinguishing IS from HS. However, the current body of evidence is limited by considerable methodological heterogeneity between studies. Registration: This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO on 21 April 2023 (CRD42023411203).
Background: Diagnostic discrimination between ischemic stroke (IS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS) is required for successful intervention with time-critical acute treatments. The available data on blood-based RNA biomarkers and discrimination between IS and HS are limited. This systematic review aimed to examine and summarize the existing literature on potentially useful blood-based RNA biomarkers that may aid in preclinical acute diagnosis. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature on the ability of blood-based RNA biomarkers to discriminate between IS and HS according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and The Web of Science for eligible randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case-control studies published in the English language without time limitation. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: We included eight studies with a total of 728 patients (436 with IS and 292 with HS) in our review. The study quality was good in five and fair in three investigations. No meta-analysis was performed due to high heterogeneity in methods and study endpoints. Reported biomarkers include miRNA-124-3p, miRNA-16, miRNA-340-5p, lncRNA XIST (X-inactive specific transcript), PFKFB3 mRNA (6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase), tRNA derivatives, tRNA fragments, extracellular miRNAs, transcriptome changes, and MCEMP1 gene expression. Assessment techniques varied widely across studies, ranging from RNA sequencing to qPCR, microarray, human transcriptome array, and ELISA. MicroRNA-124-3p, miRNA-340-5p, lncRNA XIST, PFKFB3 mRNA, and MCEMP1 gene expression differed significantly between IS and HS. In one study, principal component analysis and unsupervised learning demonstrated the utility of hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed exons to discriminate between HS and IS. Conclusions: This review demonstrates the utility of single RNA-based targets and clusters that may have diagnostic value in distinguishing IS from HS. However, the current body of evidence is limited by considerable methodological heterogeneity between studies. Registration: This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO on 21 April 2023 (CRD42023411203).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:19Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
01:20Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...