Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
Biologic Functionalization of a Biphasic Bone Substitute With Enamel Matrix Derivative Modulates Early Foreign Body
Tadas Korzinskas1,2, Sanja Stojanovic3,4, Stevo Najman3,4
1Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Sciences, Benjamin Franklin Charité Campus, Berlin, Germany.
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) combined with Maxresorb® bone substitute enhanced early tissue responses, including inflammation and neovascularization, in a mouse model. This combination demonstrated biocompatibility without adverse effects, suggesting potential for bone regeneration.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Tissue Engineering
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Biologic enhancement of bone grafts using enamel matrix derivative (EMD) may improve regenerative outcomes.
- EMD modulates host tissue response, potentially benefiting bone graft integration.
- Evaluating the in vivo tissue reaction to biphasic bone substitutes with and without EMD is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vivo tissue reaction to Maxresorb®, a biphasic bone substitute.
- To assess the combined effect of Maxresorb® and EMD on tissue response.
- To determine the biocompatibility and potential regenerative benefits of the Maxresorb® + EMD combination.
Main Methods:
- Subcutaneous implantation of Maxresorb®, EMD, Maxresorb® + EMD, or sham surgery in BALB/c mice.
- Histological and immunohistochemical analyses at 15 and 30 days post-implantation.
- Assessment of inflammation, neovascularization, fibrosis, macrophages, and biomaterial-associated giant cells (BMGCs).
Main Results:
- The Maxresorb® + EMD group exhibited higher inflammatory scores, increased macrophages and BMGCs, and enhanced neovascularization compared to controls.
- These effects were more pronounced at 30 days post-implantation.
- All tested conditions were classified as non-irritant or slightly irritant according to ISO 10993-6 standards.
Conclusions:
- The combination of EMD and Maxresorb® significantly enhanced early host tissue responses.
- The tested combination demonstrated good biocompatibility, showing no adverse effects.
- These findings support the potential regenerative benefits of biologically functionalized Maxresorb®.
More Related Videos
04:37Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions
Published on: December 30, 2025
07:29Author Spotlight: Advanced Techniques for Characterizing Tissue Mineralization in Bone Regeneration Research
Published on: September 27, 2024