Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
The Challenges of Prognosticating Persistent Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study
Kaitland M Byrd1, Madeline M Lagina1, Kathleen T Lee1
1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (K. M. B., M. M. L., K. T. L., H. C. P., and E. M. V.), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan; the HSR Center of Innovation (H. C. P. and E. M. V.), Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI; the Department of Internal Medicine (A. T.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; the Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (J. M. K.), Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care (T. J. I.), School of Medicine, and the Department of Health Policy and Management (T. J. I.), School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Background:
Medical decision-making in the ICU is influenced by a patient's anticipated clinical course. However, intensivists struggle to identify accurately which patients will experience within-ICU events-such as new late-onset shock or acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF)-that contribute to the development of persistent critical illness (PerCI). Given the uniqueness of patients who experience PerCI, understanding how intensivists process and incorporate evolving clinical information into their prognostication remains unknown for this population.
Research Question:
What processes do intensivists use to prognosticate a patient's risk of new shock or AHRF and PerCI developing and what challenges are encountered?
Study Design And Methods:
We conducted semistructured interviews with 17 intensivists at a quaternary academic medical center from July 2022 through January 2023. Interviews occurred within 4 weeks of completing medical ICU service and lasted 30 to 60 minutes. Each interview focused on 2 real-world patient cases treated by the intensivist, using chart-stimulated recall to examine the information used to prognosticate each patient's risk of new shock or AHRF and PerCI developing across the ICU course and the challenges of prognostication. We performed qualitative content analysis to explore the themes discussed by the intensivists.
Results:
We identified 3 major themes about how intensivists formulate prognostic estimates about the risk of new shock or AHRF and PerCI: first, the contextualization of patient factors at ICU admission; second, the type of illness script or mental model of disease, including those within and outside of the intensivists' expertise; and third, the impact of clinical setbacks and consultant input on the patient's predicted clinical trajectory.
Interpretation:
This study shows that intensivists rely on patient factors and the illness script to shape their prognostication. However, clinical setbacks and consultant recommendations were common, leading to changes in prognostication and subsequent medical decision-making. Future research should explore the value of time-limited trials in guiding treatment decisions in the context of prognostic uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
COPD: Pathogenesis and Clinical Features
The primary cause for the onset of COPD is cigarette smoking and exposure to air pollution. These hazardous factors initiate a chain reaction within the lungs, resulting in chronic inflammation, damage to the airways, and a...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Cancer Survival Analysis
